trustme.bro/r/…
✓ checked
trust me, bro:
here is the receipt.
the claim
The inversion barrier is larger in phosphine than it is in ammonia.
the verdict
SUPPORTED
the evidence backs this
refutedsupported
the weight of evidence
1 source for · 0 against

Peer-reviewed calculations indicate that inversion barriers are larger in phosphines than in the corresponding amines.

Evidence for · 1
1985 · cited by 0
Abstract Ab initio calculations are presented on the inversion barriers in mono-substituted amines and phosphines (NH2X and PH2X) and their radical analogs. As expected, using MP3/6-31G* energies, phosphine barriers are rather larger than those for the corresponding amines, and electronegative substituents increase the barriers. Cyano substitution causes a dramatic decrease in the ammonia barrier. All of the radical nitrogen species studied are predicted to have small or zero barriers, and the radical NH2O is predicted to be planar. PH2O also has a very small barrier.
See more details
The analysis

rails:sufficiency:supported:single_source:for=1+0p:against=0+0p | v55:sufficiency

Everything we examined (1)
This check searched the claim as stated. It did not run a separate search for evidence against it.
  1. Inversion barriers in NH2X, PH2X, NHXY, and PHXY speciespeer-reviewedno side taken
The paper trail · every fact has a biography
first checked01 Aug 2026
judged → INSUFFICIENT EVIDENCE · 001 Aug 2026
This receipt carries no identity, shared or not. Sharing publishes your connection to it, not your data.
Check your own claim
Challenge the receipt
trust me, bro: win the argument, pass the class, survive peer review.
This receipt is an automated verdict against our published method · not an opinion about any author or publication.
Terms · Privacy · How verdicts work · Dispute this receipt