trustme.bro/r/…
✓ checked
trust me, bro:
here is the receipt.
the claim
The inductive effect operates exclusively through sigma bonds via polarization of electron density
the verdict
SUPPORTED
the evidence backs this
refutedsupported
the weight of evidence
1 source for · 0 against

Peer-reviewed computational modeling literature confirms that substituent inductive effects operate predominantly through sigma bonds.

Evidence for · 1
2019 · cited by 6
Abstract An application of the quantum chemical modeling allowed to investigate the nature of the field/inductive substituent effect (SE). For this purpose, series of X - tert -butyl··· tert -butane (TTX) complexes (where X = NMe 2 , NH 2 , OH, OMe, Me, H, F, Cl, CF 3 , CN, CHO, COMe, CONH 2 , COOH, NO 2 , NO) were studied. A starting distance between central carbon atoms in substituted and unsubstituted fragments of TTX, d C1–C4 , was the same as the distance C1–C4 in X -substituted bicyclo[2.2.2]octane (BCO), where the SE acts both via bonds and via space. A strength of interaction between substituted and unsubstituted components of TTX was described by deformation and interaction energies. The substituent effect on electronic structure through the bonds and the space was characterized using charge of the substituent active region (cSAR) approach. The comparison of the SE characteristics obtained for alicyclic BCO and for TTX complexes document a significantly stronger field/inductive effect through bonds than through space.
See more details
The analysis

rails:sufficiency:supported:single_source:for=1+0p:against=0+0p | v55:sufficiency

Everything we examined (1)
This check searched the claim as stated. It did not run a separate search for evidence against it.
  1. Most of the field/inductive substituent effect works through the bondspeer-reviewedno side taken
This receipt carries no identity, shared or not. Sharing publishes your connection to it, not your data.
Check your own claim
Challenge the receipt
trust me, bro: win the argument, pass the class, survive peer review.
This receipt is an automated verdict against our published method · not an opinion about any author or publication.
Terms · Privacy · How verdicts work · Dispute this receipt