trustme.bro/r/…
✓ checked
trust me, bro:
here is the receipt.
the claim
The edges of a shadow are bright due to wave diffraction and interference effects of light.
the verdict
SUPPORTED
the evidence backs this
refutedsupported
the weight of evidence
2 sources for · 0 against
AS REPORTEDno primary record reached; this is what the reporting says

Reference sources confirm that bright bands and intensity fluctuations at the edges of shadows are produced by the diffraction and interference of light waves.

Evidence for · 2
cited by 0
But the assumption enabled him to establish the principle of interference,[6] one of the most fertile in the science of physical optics. The undulatory theory was also accepted by Fresnel who, perceiving the inadequacy of the researches of Huygens and Young, showed in 1818 by an analysis which, however, is not quite free from objection, that, by assuming that every element of a wave-surface could act as a source of secondary waves or wavelets, the diffraction bands were due to the interference of the secondary waves formed by each element of a primary wave falling upon the edge of an obstacle or aperture. One consequence of Fresnel’s theory was that the bands were independent of the nature of the diffracting edge—a fact confirmed by experiment and therefore invalidating Young’s theory that the bands were produced by the interference between the primary wave and the wave reflected from the edge of the obstacle. Another consequence, which was first mathematically deduced by Poisson and subsequently confirmed by experiment, is the paradoxical phenomenon that a small circular disk illuminated by a point source casts a shadow having a bright centre. § 12.
See more details
The analysis

rails:sufficiency:supported:single_source:for=1+0p:against=0+0p | v55:sufficiency

More for · 1
cited by 0
The law of diminution when V is moderately large is easily expressed with the aid of the series (16), (17) for G, H. We have ultimately G = 0, H = (πV)−1, so that I2=1/π2V2, or the illumination is inversely as the square of the distance from the shadow of the edge. For a point Q outside the shadow the integration extends over more than half the primary wave. The intensity may be expressed by and the maxima and minima occur when whence When V = 0, viz. at the edge of the shadow, I2 = 1/2; when V = ∞, I2 = 2, on the scale adopted. The latter is the intensity due to the uninterrupted wave. The quadrupling of the intensity in passing outwards from the edge of the shadow is, however, accompanied by fluctuations giving rise to bright and dark bands. The position of these bands determined by (23) may be very simply expressed when V is large, for then sensibly G = 0, and n being an integer. In terms of δ, we have from (2) The first maximum in fact occurs when δ = 3/8λ −·0046λ, and the first minimum when δ = 7/8λ −·0016λ, the corrections being readily obtainable from a table of G by substitution of the approximate value of V.
Everything we examined (2) — 1 independent source
This check searched the claim as stated. It did not run a separate search for evidence against it.
  1. Wikisource: 1911 Encyclopædia Britannica/Lightreferencesame source L1no side taken
  2. Wikisource: 1911 Encyclopædia Britannica/Diffraction of Light/10referencesame source L1no side taken
This receipt carries no identity, shared or not. Sharing publishes your connection to it, not your data.
Check your own claim
Challenge the receipt
trust me, bro: win the argument, pass the class, survive peer review.
This receipt is an automated verdict against our published method · not an opinion about any author or publication.
Terms · Privacy · How verdicts work · Dispute this receipt