trustme.bro/r/…
✓ checked
trust me, bro:
here is the receipt.
the claim

The early US Supreme Court instituted the power of judicial review through its own rulings

the verdict
SUPPORTED
the evidence backs this
Recorded sources
2 sources for · 0 against

Counts group repeated records of the same source within each side. They do not measure evidence strength or source independence.

The early U.S. Supreme Court established the power of judicial review through its own landmark ruling in Marbury v. Madison (1803).

The analysis

Papers [0] and [1] both explicitly state that the doctrine and power of judicial review were articulated and established by the Supreme Court itself in the 1803 Marbury v. Madison decision. None of the retrieved papers refute this claim.

Evidence for · 2
Recorded source metadata

W. E. Nelson. Marbury v. Madison : The Origins and Legacy of Judicial Review. 2000. https://doi.org/10.2307/3185357

Marbury v. Madison established judicial review when the Supreme Court itself articulated the power to strike down acts of Congress.

See more details
More for · 1
Recorded source metadata

Blerton Sinani. Global Patterns of Constitutional Judicial Review Systems: Two Major Models of Constitutional Judicial Review in the World. 2024. https://doi.org/10.62768/tbj/2024/14/1/10

The US Supreme Court set a precedent in 1803 via Marbury v. Madison by declaring legislative acts unconstitutional.

The paper trail · every fact has a biography
first checked01 Aug 2026
judged → SUPPORTED · 8401 Aug 2026
Anyone with this link can read the claim and its public receipt, including any personal information in that text. Open permanent receipt.
Check your own claim
Challenge the receipt
Requests are recorded for review. This does not start an automatic check or guarantee a response time.
trust me, bro: win the argument, pass the class, survive peer review.

Citation formatting by citeproc-js (Frank Bennett) and the Citation Style Language project. Source and licenses.

This receipt is an automated verdict against our published method · not an opinion about any author or publication.
Terms · Privacy · How verdicts work · Dispute this receipt