The double helix structure of DNA is essential for accurate replication and genetic information storage.
the verdict
SUPPORTED
the evidence backs this
refutedsupported
the weight of evidence
10 sources for · 0 against
Peer-reviewed scientific literature confirms that the double helix structure of DNA provides the necessary framework for copying and inheriting genetic information accurately.
In their seminal publication describing the structure of the DNA double helix, Watson and Crick wrote what may be one of the greatest understatements in the scientific literature, namely that "It has not escaped our notice that the specific pairing we have postulated immediately suggests a possible copying mechanism for the genetic material." Half a century later, we more fully appreciate what a huge challenge it is to replicate six billion nucleotides with the accuracy needed to stably maintain the human genome over many generations. This challenge is perhaps greater than was realized 50 years ago, because subsequent studies have revealed that the genome can be destabilized not only by environmental stresses that generate a large number and variety of potentially cytotoxic and mutagenic lesions in DNA but also by various sequence motifs of normal DNA that present challenges to replication. Towards a better understanding of the many determinants of genome stability, this chapter reviews the fidelity with which undamaged and damaged DNA is copied, with a focus on the eukaryotic B- and Y-family DNA polymerases, and considers how this fidelity is achieved.
The accurate copying of genetic information in the double helix of DNA is essential for inheritance of traits that define the phenotype of cells and the organism. The core machineries that copy DNA are conserved in all three domains of life: bacteria, archaea, and eukaryotes. This article outlines the general nature of the DNA replication machinery, but also points out important and key differences. The most complex organisms, eukaryotes, have to coordinate the initiation of DNA replication from many origins in each genome and impose regulation that maintains genomic integrity, not only for the sake of each cell, but for the organism as a whole. In addition, DNA replication in eukaryotes needs to be coordinated with inheritance of chromatin, developmental patterning of tissues, and cell division to ensure that the genome replicates once per cell division cycle.
For more than three decades, investigators have sought to identify the precise locations where DNA replication initiates in mammalian genomes. The development of molecular and biochemical approaches to identify start sites of DNA replication (origins) based on the presence of defining and characteristic replication intermediates at specific loci led to the identification of only a handful of mammalian replication origins. The limited number of identified origins prevented a comprehensive and exhaustive search for conserved genomic features that were capable of specifying origins of DNA replication. More recently, the adaptation of origin-mapping assays to genome-wide approaches has led to the identification of tens of thousands of replication origins throughout mammalian genomes, providing an unprecedented opportunity to identify both genetic and epigenetic features that define and regulate their distribution and utilization. Here we summarize recent advances in our understanding of how primary sequence, chromatin environment, and nuclear architecture contribute to the dynamic selection and activation of replication origins across diverse cell types and developmental stages.
Genome duplication is carried out by pairs of replication forks that assemble at origins of replication and then move in opposite directions. DNA replication ends when converging replication forks meet. During this process, which is known as replication termination, DNA synthesis is completed, the replication machinery is disassembled and daughter molecules are resolved. In this Review, we outline the steps that are likely to be common to replication termination in most organisms, namely, fork convergence, synthesis completion, replisome disassembly and decatenation. We briefly review the mechanism of termination in the bacterium Escherichia coli and in simian virus 40 (SV40) and also focus on recent advances in eukaryotic replication termination. In particular, we discuss the recently discovered E3 ubiquitin ligases that control replisome disassembly in yeast and higher eukaryotes, and how their activity is regulated to avoid genome instability.
The discovery of the DNA double helix structure half a century ago immediately suggested a mechanism for its duplication by semi-conservative copying of the nucleotide sequence into two DNA daughter strands. Shortly after, a second fundamental step toward the elucidation of the mechanism of DNA replication was taken with the isolation of the first enzyme able to polymerize DNA from a template. In the subsequent years, the basic mechanism of DNA replication and its enzymatic machinery components were elucidated, mostly through genetic approaches and in vitro biochemistry. Most recently, the spatial and temporal organization of the DNA replication process in vivo within the context of chromatin and inside the intact cell are finally beginning to be elucidated. On the one hand, recent advances in genome-wide high throughput techniques are providing a new wave of information on the progression of genome replication at high spatial resolution. On the other hand, novel super-resolution microscopy techniques are just starting to give us the first glimpses of how DNA replication is organized within the context of single intact cells with high spatial resolution. The integration of these data with time lapse microscopy analysis will give us the ability to film and dissect the replication of the genome in situ and in real time.
The flipping-out of a DNA base from the double helical structure is a key step of many cellular processes, such as DNA replication, modification and repair. Base pair opening is the first step of base flipping and the exact mechanism is still not well understood. We investigate sequence effects on base pair opening using extensive classical molecular dynamics simulations targeting the opening of 11 different canonical base pairs in two DNA sequences. Two popular biomolecular force fields are applied. To enhance sampling and calculate free energies, we bias the simulation along a simple distance coordinate using a newly developed adaptive sampling algorithm. The simulation is guided back and forth along the coordinate, allowing for multiple opening pathways. We compare the calculated free energies with those from an NMR study and check assumptions of the model used for interpreting the NMR data. Our results further show that the neighboring sequence is an important factor for the opening free energy, but also indicates that other sequence effects may play a role. All base pairs are observed to have a propensity for opening toward the major groove. The preferred opening base is cytosine for GC base pairs, while for AT there is sequence dependent competition between the two bases. For AT opening, we identify two non-canonical base pair interactions contributing to a local minimum in the free energy profile. For both AT and CG we observe long-lived interactions with water and with sodium ions at specific sites on the open base pair.
DNA is a very important macromolecule in biology. It carries the genetic code for every living creature. The finding of the double helix is undoubtedly one of the most significant discoveries in the twentieth century (Watson & Crick 1953a). It inspired many important discoveries in biology and medicine. Now, the double helix has become an icon of molecular biology (Olby, 2003). Presently, DNA is widely accepted as a right-handed double helix taught in almost all textbooks of biochemistry and molecular biology. The knowledge of DNA is widely applied in scientific research, industry, agriculture and medicine. The information of DNA has been successfully used in many fields previously unimaginable: archaeology, drug design, forensic science, nanometer technology, etc. After more than 50 years of intensive investigation, the basic idea of the WatsonCrick Model is still considered to be correct (Crick et al. 1979; Arnott 2006). Innumerable sequencing data proved that the two anti-parallel strands of the DNA are held by hydrogen bonds between AT and GC base pairs. The secondary structure of it was additionally supported by the X-ray crystallography from the double stranded oligodeoxyribonucleotides. Ironically, prior to the right-handed B-DNA, the detailed molecular structure of main atoms in a left-handed Z-DNA was determined by X-ray crystallography (Wang, et al., 1979). Nevertheless, Z-DNA is generally assumed as a special form and seldom found in native DNA, since its presenc
Medelian Inheritance 303 DNA is the Genetic Material 305 The Double Helix 307 Semiconservative … repeated hydrogen bonding within the double helix structure and bonding between virtually all … are essential for formation of cilia and flagella, but they are not essential for formation
eye-shaped structure that forms when a pair of replication forks, each growing away from the origin, separates the strands of the double helix during DNA replication
This glossary of cellular and molecular biology is a list of definitions of terms and concepts commonly used in the study of cell biology, molecular biology, and related disciplines, including molecular genetics, biochemistry, and microbiology. It is split across two articles:
Glossary of cellular and molecular biology (0–L) lists terms beginning with numbers and those beginning with the letters
r…
The effect of supercoil and temperature on the recognition of palindromic and non-palindromic regions in phi X174 replicative form DNA by S1 and Bal31. The effect of supercoil and temperature on the topology of phi X174 replicative form (RF) DNA was studied using single-strand specific endonucleases S1 and Bal31 as probes for cruciform extrusion and other structural perturbations of the B-helix. Both enzymes were found to recognize specifically and reproducibly over 30 sites, most of which were cleaved by both enzymes independent of the superhelicity of the genome. A negative superhelical density exceeding 0.06 stabilized a transition in the DNA conformation that generated several new cleavage sites for Bal31. The underlying structures appeared to be only transiently stable and were lost from in vitro supercoiled DNA during brief incubation at 65 degrees C. They were generally absent from in vivo supercoiled RF DNA of equal superhelicity as a consequence of the extraction and storage procedure.
Everything we examined (10)
This check searched the claim as stated. It did not run a separate search for evidence against it.