Trust Me Bro: the receipt

trustme.bro/r/…

✓ checked

trust me, bro:

here is the receipt.

the claim

The discovery of tuff among dinosaur fossils in Utah contradicts scientific dating consensus.

the verdict

REFUTED

the evidence says no

confidence 13/100

The presence of volcanic tuff layers among dinosaur fossils in Utah does not contradict scientific dating consensus; rather, geochronologists routinely use these tuffs to radiometrically date and refine the stratigraphic timeline of dinosaur-bearing formations.

Evidence against · 3

Revised geochronology, correlation, and dinosaur stratigraphic ranges of the Santonian-Maastrichtian (Late Cretaceous) formations of the Western Interior of North America

2017 · cited by 117

Paper 0 uses radiometric dates from interbedded tuffs to refine dinosaur stratigraphic ranges in Utah without contradiction.

citation format

See more details

More against · 2

Correlation and Provenance of Upper Cretaceous (Campanian) Fluvial Strata, Utah, U.S.A., from Zircon U-Pb Geochronology and Petrography

2011 · cited by 62

Paper 1 demonstrates that zircon U-Pb geochronology from bentonitic tuffs in Utah successfully correlates with established Cretaceous timescales.

Formation of magnesium‐clay in a lacustrine microbialite‐bearing carbonate deposit, Eocene Green River Formation, Sanpete County, Utah

2023 · cited by 4

Paper 5 applies U-Pb dating of tuff beds in Utah to establish regional chronostratigraphic frameworks in agreement with scientific consensus.

The paper trail · every fact has a biography

first checked31 Jul 2026

judged → REFUTED · 1331 Jul 2026

More receipts

Is it true that Increased gun ownership rates correlate with a reduction in violent crime?Is it true that Dairy products cause an increase in mucus production and thickness?Is it true that Using a standing desk for several hours improves health outcomes compared to prolonged sitting?

Random receipt →The Trust Wiki →

This receipt carries no identity, shared or not. Sharing publishes your connection to it, not your data.

Check your own claim

Challenge the receipt

I have a source that contradicts this verdict I have a source that supports it No source: the research is thin, dig deeper

trust me, bro: win the argument, pass the class, survive peer review.

This receipt is an automated verdict against our published method · not an opinion about any author or publication.
Terms · Privacy · How verdicts work · Dispute this receipt