trustme.bro/r/…
✓ checked
trust me, bro:
here is the receipt.
the claim
The dependence of radiative forcing on carbon dioxide concentration is logarithmic due to band saturation effects
the verdict
SUPPORTED
the evidence backs this
refutedsupported
the weight of evidence
3 sources for · 0 against

Peer-reviewed literature and reference materials confirm that the relationship between carbon dioxide concentration and radiative forcing is logarithmic.

Evidence for · 3
2014 · cited by 42
AbstractLine‐by‐line radiative transfer computations show that the logarithmic dependence of radiative forcing on gas concentration not only applies to broadband irradiation fluxes such as in the well‐known case of the CO2 forcing, but also applies to the spectral radiance change due to both CO2 and other gases, such as H2O. The logarithmic relationship holds for monochromatic radiance requires an explanation beyond the conventional ideas based on the spectroscopic features of the gas absorption lines. We show that the phenomenon can be explained by an Emission Layer Displacement Model, which describes the radiance response to gas perturbation under normal atmospheric conditions such as temperature linearly varying with height and gas concentration exponentially decaying with height.
See more details
The analysis

rails:sufficiency:supported:for=2+1p:against=0+0p | v55:sufficiency

More for · 2
2025 · cited by 0
Abstract Most research on the state dependence of climate sensitivity has focused on radiative feedbacks, with less attention given to radiative forcing. However, recent studies show that the carbon dioxide (CO 2 ) radiative forcing depends not only on the CO 2 concentration but also on the base state, particularly the stratospheric temperature profile. Hence, we here carry out atmosphere-only experiments with prescribed sea surface temperatures using Community Earth System Model, version 1, Large Ensemble (CESM1-LE), broadband radiative transfer calculations, and a one-dimensional radiative–convective equilibrium model to thoroughly investigate the dependence of effective radiative forcing (ERF) on varying levels of CO 2 forcing and base-state stratospheric temperatures from 1/16× to 16×CO 2 . Using both the CESM1-LE and a radiative–convective equilibrium model, we demonstrate that ERF strongly depends on the CO 2 value of the underlying base state, deviating significantly from a simple logarithmic relationship with CO 2 concentration. Specifically, doubling CO 2 from a base state of 8×CO 2 results in an ERF value that is 50% higher than doubling CO 2 from a 1/16×CO 2 state. By decomposing ERF into instantaneous radiative forcing (IRF) and radiative adjustments, we show that the IRF is largely responsible for the state dependence of ERF. We attribute the increase in IRF with CO 2 concentrations to the stratospheric cooling at 10 hPa. Furthermore, we find that the radiative a
cited by 0
Radiative forcing (or climate forcing) is a concept used to quantify a change to the balance of energy flowing through a planetary atmosphere. Various Radiative forcing (or climate forcing) is a concept used to quantify a change to the balance of energy flowing through a planetary atmosphere. Various factors contribute to this change in energy balance, such as concentrations of greenhouse gases and aerosols, and changes in surface albedo and solar irradiance. In more technical terms, it is defined as "the change in the net, downward minus upward The atmospheric burden of greenhouse gases due to human activity has grown especially rapidly during the last several decades (since about year 1950). For carbon dioxide, the 50% increase (C/C0 = 1.5) realized as of year 2020 since 1750 corresponds to a cumulative radiative forcing change (delta F) of +2.17 W/m2. Assuming no change in the emissions growth path, a doubling of concentrations (C/C0 = 2) within the next several decades would correspond to a cumulative radiative forcing change (delta F) of +3.71 W/m2. The relationship between CO2 and radiative forcing is logarithmic at concentrations up to around eight times the current value. Constant concentration increases thus have a progressively smaller warming effect. However, the first-order approximation is inaccurate at higher concentrations and there is no saturation in the absorption of infrared radiation by CO2. Various mechanism behind the logarithmic scaling has been proposed but the spectrum distribution of the carbon dioxide seems to be essential, particularly a broadening in the relevant 15-μm band coming from a Fermi resonance present in the molecule. The IPCC summarized the current scientific consensus about radiative forcing changes as follows: "Human-caused radiative forcing of 2.72 [1.96 to 3.48] W/m2 in 2019 relative to 1750 has warmed the climate system. This warming is mainly due to increased GHG concentrations, partly reduced by cooling due to increased aerosol concentrations". Radiative forcing can be a useful way to compare the growing warming influence of different anthropogenic greenhouse gases over time. The radiative forcing of long-lived and well-mixed greenhouse gases have been increasing in earth's atmosphere since the industrial revolution. The table includes the direct forcing contributions from carbon dioxide (CO2), methane (CH4), nitrous oxide (N2O); chlorofluorocarbons (CFCs) 12 and 11; and fifteen other halogenated gases. These data do not include the significant forcing contributions from shorter-lived and less-well-mixed gases or aerosols; including those indirect forcings from the decay of methane and some halogens. They also do not account for changes in land use or… T…
Everything we examined (4) — 3 independent sources
This check searched the claim as stated. It did not run a separate search for evidence against it.
  1. State Dependence of CO2 Effective Radiative Forcing from 1/16× to 16×CO2peer-reviewedno side taken
  2. Why logarithmic? A note on the dependence of radiative forcing on gas concentrationpeer-reviewedsame source L4no side taken
  3. Radiative forcingreferenceno side taken
  4. Why logarithmic? A note on the dependence of radiative forcing on gas concentrationpeer-reviewedsame source L4no side taken
This receipt carries no identity, shared or not. Sharing publishes your connection to it, not your data.
Check your own claim
Challenge the receipt
trust me, bro: win the argument, pass the class, survive peer review.
This receipt is an automated verdict against our published method · not an opinion about any author or publication.
Terms · Privacy · How verdicts work · Dispute this receipt