The delayed choice quantum eraser violates the principle of causality
the verdict
CONTESTED
contested - evenly split
refutedsupported
the weight of evidence
4 sources for · 4 against
While some studies and interpretations state that the delayed-choice quantum eraser invokes apparent retrocausality or violates classical cause-effect relationships, peer-reviewed treatments and standard quantum mechanical resolutions demonstrate that these effects can be explained forward-in-time without violating causality.
Abstract
The delayed-choice quantum eraser has been intensively studied for the wave-particle duality of a single photon in an interferometric system over the last decades. Coincidence measurements between quantum erasers have also been applied for the nonlocal quantum feature, satisfying the Bell inequality violation. However, those quantum features have not been clearly understood yet, resulting in the quantum mystery. Recently a coherence approach has been tried for the quantum eraser to unveil the quantum mystery. Here, a phase quantization of higher-order intensity products between coherently controlled quantum erasers is presented using a quarter wave plate-induced phase shift between orthogonal polarization bases of a single photon. Theoretical solutions of both photonic-de-Broglie-wave-like quantum features and nonlocal quantum correlations are presented for further discussions of quantum mechanics.
It is demonstrated that ‘quantum eraser’ (QE) experiments do not erase any information. Nor do they demonstrate ‘temporal nonlocality’ in their ‘delayed choice’ form, beyond standard EPR correlations. It is shown that the erroneous erasure claims arise from assuming that the improper mixed state of the signal photon physically prefers either the ‘which way’ or ‘both ways’ basis, when no such preference is warranted. The latter point is illustrated through comparison of the QE spatial state space with the spin-1/2 space of particles in the EPR-spin experiment.
Quantum superposition lies at the core of quantum mechanics and has been applied to various quantum technologies. Over the past few decades, Wheeler’s delayed-choice thought experiment has been extensively examined to explore the wave-particle duality of the complementary nature of quantum mechanics. The essence of the delayed-choice quantum eraser lies in the contradictory quantum property that violates the cause-effect relationship in classical physics. Our experiments present empirical evidence of the quantum eraser using coherent photon pairs provided in a noninteracting Mach-Zehnder interferometer for the polarization-basis control of output photons. The observed interference fringe is the direct proof of the quantum eraser, where the violation of the cause-effect relationship is due to the selective choices of the measurement events.
Abstract Quantum superposition is the cornerstone of quantum mechanics, where interference fringes originate in the self-interference of a single photon via indistinguishable photon characteristics. Wheeler’s delayed-choice experiments have been extensively studied for the wave-particle duality over the last several decades to understand the complementarity theory of quantum mechanics. The heart of the delayed-choice quantum eraser is in the mutually exclusive quantum feature violating the cause-effect relation. Here, we experimentally demonstrate the quantum eraser using coherent photon pairs by the delayed choice of a polarizer placed out of the interferometer. Coherence solutions of the observed quantum eraser are derived from a typical Mach-Zehnder interferometer, where the violation of the cause-effect relation is due to selective measurements of basis choice.
generically arise from quantum entanglement, including for example the delayed choice quantum eraser. However accounts of quantum entanglement can be given
Retrocausality, or backwards causation, is a concept of cause and effect in which an effect precedes its cause in time and so a later event affects an earlier one. In quantum physics, the distinction between cause and effect is not made at the most fundamental level and so time-symmetric systems can be viewed as causal or retrocausal. Philosophical considerations of time travel often address the s
Ernst…
I discuss the delayed choice quantum eraser experiment by drawing an analogy to a Bell-type measurement and giving a straightforward account in standard quantum mechanics. The delayed choice quantum eraser experiment turns out to resemble a Bell-type scenario in which the resolution of the paradox is rather trivial, and so there really is no mystery. At first glance, the experiment suggests that measurements on one part of an entangled photon pair (the idler) can be employed to control whether the measurement outcome of the other part of the photon pair (the signal) produces interference fringes at a screen after being sent through a double slit. Significantly, the choice whether there is interference or not can be made long after the signal photon encounters the screen. The results of the experiment have been alleged to invoke some sort of backwards in time influence. I argue that this issue can be eliminated by taking into proper account the role of the signal photon. Likewise, in the de Broglie–Bohm picture the trajectories of the particle can be given a well-defined description at any instant of time during the experiment. Thus, it is again clear that there is no need to resort to any kind of backwards in time influence.
Quanta 2019; 8: 44-56.
A Standard Quantum Mechanical Treatment to Rationalize the Delayed-Choice Quantum Eraser
2026 · cited by 0
Ever since the proposal of delayed choice quantum erasure and subsequent realization in the experiment by Kim et al., the interpretation and implications of delayed-choice experiments have remained a subject of intense foundational debate. This paper resolves the apparent paradox attached to the experiment using standard quantum mechanics. Using an extended Mach-Zehnder interferometer which captures every operational feature of the original experiment, we show that choosing between which-path and erasure detectors is simply a choice of measurement bases, which does not rewrite a photon's past. Furthermore, by mapping the experiment to a two-way Stern-Gerlach framework, we prove that quantum erasure is an expected result of measuring entangled states, not a physical anomaly. Ultimately, through a pedagogical game, we illustrate that the illusion of retrocausality arises from asking illegitimate questions, and that a forward-in-time description is entirely sufficient to explain the logic.
light. The delayed-choice quantum eraser is a version of the EPR paradox in which the observation (or not) of interference after the passage of a photon
Faster-than-light (superluminal or supercausal) travel and communication are the conjectural propagation of matter or information faster than the speed of light in vacuum (c). The special theory of relativity implies that only particles with zero rest mass (i.e., photons) may travel at the speed of light, and that nothing may travel faster.
Particles whose speed exceeds that of light (tachyons) ha
The delayed-choice quantum eraser is a version of the EPR paradox in which the observation (or not) of interference after the passage of a photon through a double slit experiment depends on the conditions of observation of a second photon entangled with the first. The characteristic of this experiment is that the observation of the second photon can take place at a later time than the observation of the first photon, which may give the impression that the measurement of the later photons "retroactively" determines whether the earlier photons show interference or not, although the interference pattern can only be seen by correlating the measurements of both members of every pair and so it cannot be observed until both photons have been measured, ensuring that an experimenter watching only the photons going through the slit does not obtain information about the other photons in an faster-than-light or backwards-in-time manner.
Everything we examined (8) — 7 independent sources
This check searched the claim as stated. It did not run a separate search for evidence against it.