The crew of the Space Shuttle Challenger survived the initial breakup
the verdict
SUPPORTED
the evidence backs this
refutedsupported
the weight of evidence
7 sources for · 0 against
AS REPORTEDno primary record reached; this is what the reporting says
Official investigations and news reports indicate that the crew of the Space Shuttle Challenger likely survived the initial breakup of the vehicle and remained conscious for a short period inside the intact crew cabin.
On January 28, 1986, Space Shuttle Challenger broke apart 73 seconds into its flight, killing all seven crew members. The spacecraft disintegrated about
On January 28, 1986, Space Shuttle Challenger broke apart 73 seconds into its flight, killing all seven crew members. The spacecraft disintegrated about 46,000 feet (14 km) above the Atlantic Ocean, off the coast of Cape Canaveral, Florida, at 16:39:13 UTC (11:39:13 a.m. EST, local time at the launch site). It was the first fatal accident involving an American spacecraft while in flight.
The missi
On…
On January 28, 1986, Space Shuttle Challenger broke apart 73 seconds into its flight, killing all seven crew members. The spacecraft disintegrated about 46,000 feet (14 km) above the Atlantic Ocean, off the coast of Cape Canaveral, Florida, at 16:39:13 UTC (11:39:13 a.m. EST, local time at the launch site). It was the first fatal accident involving an American spacecraft while in flight.
The mission, designated STS-51-L, was the 10th flight for the orbiter and the 25th flight of the NASA's Space Shuttle program. The crew was scheduled to deploy a commercial communications satellite and study Halley's Comet while they were in orbit, in addition to taking schoolteacher Christa McAuliffe into space under the Teacher in Space Project. This latter task resulted in a higher-than-usual media interest in and coverage of the mission, and the launch and subsequent disaster were seen live in many schools across the United States.
The cause of the disaster was the failure of the primary and secondary O-ring seals in a joint in the right Space Shuttle Solid Rocket Booster (SRB). The record-low temperatures on the morning of the launch had stiffened the rubber O-rings, reducing their ability to seal the joints. Shortly after liftoff the seals were breached, and hot pressurized gas from within the SRB leaked through the joint and burned through the aft attachment strut connecting it to the external propellant tank (ET), then into the tank itself. The collapse of the ET's internal structures and the rotation of the SRB that followed propelled the shuttle stack, traveling at a speed of Mach 1.92, into a direction that allowed aerodynamic forces to tear the orbiter apart. Both SRBs detached from the now-destroyed ET and continued to fly uncontrollably until the range safety officer (RSO) sent a signal to destroy them.
The crew compartment containing human remains, and many other fragments from the shuttle, were recovered from the ocean floor after a three-month search and recovery operation. The exact timing of the deaths of the crew is not known, but several crew members are thought to have survived the initial breakup of the spacecraft. The orbiter had no escape system, and the impact of the crew compartment at terminal velocity with the ocean surface was too violent to be survivable.
The disaster resulted in a 32-month hiatus in the Space Shuttle program. President Ronald Reagan created the Rogers Commission to investigate the accident. The commission criticized NASA's organizational culture and decision-making processes that had contributed to the accident. Test data since 1977 had demonstrated a potentially catastrophic flaw in the SRBs' O-rings, but neither NASA nor SRB manufacturer Morton Thiokol had addressed this known defect. NASA managers also disregarded engineers' warnings about the dangers of launching in low temperatures and did not report these technical concerns to their superiors.
As a result of this disaster, NASA established the Office of Safety, Reliability, and Quality Assurance, and arranged for deployment of commercial satellites from expendable launch vehicles, rather than from a crewed orbiter. The construction of a new Space Shuttle orbiter, Endeavour, was approved in 1987 to replace Challenger, and the new orbiter first flew in 1992. Subsequent missions were launched with redesigned SRBs and their crews wore pressurized suits during ascent and reentry. In February 2003 the Space Shuttle Columbia disintegrated during re-entry. The Columbia Accident Investigation Board concluded that NASA had failed to learn lessons from the Challenger disaster, which resulted in the second disaster.
At T+72.284, the right SRB pulled away from the aft strut that attached it to the ET, causing lateral acceleration that was felt by the crew. At the same time, pressure in the LH2 tank began dropping. Pilot Mike Smith said "Uh-oh", which was the last crew comment recorded. At T+73.124, white vapor was seen flowing away from the ET, after which the aft dome of the LH2 tank fell off. The resulting release and ignition of all liquid hydrogen in the tank pushed the LH2 tank forward into the liquid oxygen (LOX) tank with a force equating to roughly 3,000,000 pounds (13 MN), while the right SRB collided with the intertank structure. The failure of the LH2 and LOX tanks resulted in a boiling liquid expanding vapor explosion (BLEVE), with a large part of the liquid evaporating back into gas almost instantly.
These events resulted in an abrupt change to the shuttle stack's attitude and direction, which was shrouded from view by the vaporized contents of the now-destroyed ET. As it traveled at Mach 1.92, Challenger took aerodynamic forces it was not designed to withstand and broke into several large pieces: a wing, the (still firing) main engines, the crew cabin and hypergolic fuel leaking from the ruptured reaction control system were among the parts identified exiting the vapor cloud. The disaster unfolded at an altitude of 46,000 feet (14 km). Both SRBs survived the breakup of the shuttle stack and continued flying, now unguided by the attitude and trajectory control of their mothership, until their flight termination systems were activated at T+110.
The debris from the SRBs was widely distributed due to the detonation of their linear shaped charges. The identification of SRB material was primarily conducted by crewed submarines and submersibles. The
AP News
SPACE CENTER, Houston (AP) _ Space shuttle Challenger pilot Michael J. Smith exclaimed ''Uh-oh 3/8'’ at the moment the spacecraft exploded, and some of the crew apparently lived long enough to turn on emergency air packs, NASA said Monday.
Smith’s remark, heard on a tape of the shuttle’s intercom system, was the first indication that any of the seven astronauts killed may have been aware of the Jan. 28 disaster, the worst in the history of space exploration.
The astronauts probably survived the explosion and breakup of the shuttle orbiter and could have had 6 to 15 seconds of ''useful consciousness’’ inside the crew compartment after the blast, said Dr. Joseph Kerwin, an astronaut- physician who investigated the cause of death for the crew.
The force of the crew compartment hitting the ocean was so destructive, however, that the precise cause of death for the crew could not be determined, he said.
The intercom tapes, which include enthusiastic chatter among the crew about
Challenger Crew Report - NASA
Search
## Suggested Searches
NASA Communications
Jul 28, 1986
Article
Editorial Headnote: On July 28, 1986 Rear Admiral Richard H. Truly, NASA’s Associate Administrator for Space Flight and a former astronaut, released this report from Joseph P. Kerwin, biomedical specialist from the Johnson Space Center in Houston, Texas, relating to the deaths of the astronauts in the Challenger accident. Dr. Kerwin had been commissioned to undertake this study soon after the accident on January 28, 1986. A copy of this report is available in the NASA Historical Reference Collection, Hstory Office, NASA Headquarters, Washington, DC.
RADM Richard H. TrulyAssociate Administrator for Space FlightNASA HeadquartersCode MWashington, DC 20546
Dear Admiral Truly:
The search for wreckage of the Challenger crew cabin has been completed. A team of engineers and scientists has analyzed the wreckage and all other available evidence in an attempt to determine the cause of death of the Challenger crew. This letter is to report to you on the results of this effort. The findings are inconclusive. The impact of the crew compartment with the ocean surface was so violent that e
5 Facts About the Space Shuttle Challenger Disaster | HISTORY By: Sarah Pruitt 1980s 5 Things You May Not Know About the Space Shuttle Challenger Disaster The space shuttle Challenger blew apart some 73 seconds after liftoff from Cape Canaveral, Florida, on January 28, 1986, killing all seven astronauts on board. Sarah Pruitt Getty Images / Bettmann / Contributor Published: January 28, 2016 Last Updated: May 28, 2025 1 . The Challenger didn’t actually explode. A cloud of fire engulfed the space shuttle just 73 seconds after liftoff, at an altitude of some 46,000 feet (14,000 meters). It looked like an explosion, the media called it an explosion and even NASA officials mistakenly described it that way initially. But later investigation showed that, in fact, there was no detonation or explosion in the way we commonly understand the concept. A failed O-ring seal in the shuttle’s right solid-fuel rocket booster designed to prevent leaks during liftoff weakened in the frigid temperatures and failed, and hot gas began pouring through the leak. The external fuel tank itself collapsed and tore apart, and the resulting flood of liquid oxygen and hydrogen created the huge fireball believed by many to be an explosion. 2 . The astronauts aboard the shuttle didn’t die instantly. A seal in the shuttle’s right solid-fuel rocket booster designed to prevent leaks between booster segments during liftoff weakened in the frigid temperatures and failed, and hot gas began pouring through the leak. The external fuel tank itself collapsed and tore apart, and the resulting flood of liquid oxygen and hydrogen created the huge fireball believed by many to be an explosion. After the collapse of its fuel tank, the Challenger itself remained momentarily intact and actually continued moving upward. Without its fuel tank and boosters beneath it, however, powerful aerodynamic forces soon pulled the orbiter apart. The pieces—including the crew cabin—reached an altitude of some 65,000 feet before fal
Challenger Mainly Intact Until It Hit Water, Evidence Shows - The Washington Post
Democracy Dies in Darkness
By Michael Isikoff, Washington Post Staff Writer; Staff writer Charles Fishman contributed to this report.
CAPE CANAVERAL, April 9, 1986 -- The space shuttle Challenger did not explode 73 seconds into its Jan. 28 launch, and some parts -- including the crew cabin -- remained essentially intact until they smashed into the Atlantic Ocean minutes later, new evidence on the accident indicated today.
Wreckage from the shuttle orbiter, displayed to reporters here for the first time, showed virtually no heat or blast damage from the accident, a National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB) investigator reported.
'Uh-Oh' - The Washington Post
Democracy Dies in Darkness
By Kathy Sawyer
The space agency revealed yesterday that, an instant before a spreading fireball ended all communications aboard the doomed shuttle Challenger, pilot Michael J. Smith uttered one last phrase: "Uh-oh." For several more seconds, at least some crew members apparently remained conscious and tried to activate emergency oxygen supplies.
The crew may have remained conscious for six to 15 seconds or longer as the ship began to break up at 48,000 feet. The space shuttle then soared to its peak altitude of 65,000 feet before plummeting in 165 seconds to a certainly fatal impact in the Atlantic Ocean at a speed of 207 miles per hour.
Did Crew Die Instantly? Questions Re-emerging - The New York Times
[Skip to content](#site-content)[Skip to site index](#site-index)
[Science](https://www.nytimes.com/section/science)
[](https://www.nytimes.com/)
[Today’s Paper](https://www.nytimes.com/section/todayspaper)
[Science](https://www.nytimes.com/section/science)|Did Crew Die Instantly? Questions Re-emerging
[](https://www.nytimes.com/)[](https://www.nytimes.com/)
https://www.nytimes.com/1986/03/11/science/did-crew-die-instantly-questions-re-emerging.html
* Share full article
* * Advertisement
[SKIP ADVERTISEMENT](#after-top)
You have a preview view of this article while we are checking your access. When we have confirmed access, the full article content will load.
Supported by
[SKIP ADVERTISEMENT](#after-sponsor)
# Did Crew Die Instantly? Questions Re-emerging
* Share full article
* * By[William J. Broad, Special To the New York Times](https://www.nytimes.com/by/william-j-broad)
* March 11, 1986
![Did Crew Die Instantly? Que
Everything we examined (7) — 6 independent sources
This check searched the claim as stated. It did not run a separate search for evidence against it.