trustme.bro/r/…
✓ checked
trust me, bro:
here is the receipt.
the claim
The conditional 'if not p then q' is logically equivalent to 'p or q'
the verdict
COMMON KNOWLEDGE
no citation needed for this one
refutedsupported
the weight of evidence
no sources on either side

The logical equivalence between the material conditional 'if not p then q' and 'p or q' is a foundational theorem of classical propositional logic, representing a basic definition that requires no empirical citation.

See more details
The analysis

The claim states a fundamental, definitional equivalence in classical propositional logic (material implication: thet ¬p → q is equivalent to p ∨ q). By definition, this is common knowledge in logic and mathematics, requiring no external empirical validation or literature citations. Therefore, STEP 0 classifies it as COMMON_KNOWLEDGE.

The paper trail · every fact has a biography
first checked04 Aug 2026
judged → COMMON KNOWLEDGE · 9504 Aug 2026
This receipt carries no identity, shared or not. Sharing publishes your connection to it, not your data.
Check your own claim
Challenge the receipt
trust me, bro: win the argument, pass the class, survive peer review.
This receipt is an automated verdict against our published method · not an opinion about any author or publication.
Terms · Privacy · How verdicts work · Dispute this receipt