trustme.bro/r/…
✓ checked
trust me, bro:
here is the receipt.
the claim

The concept of an intuitive intellect is accepted as epistemically possible in philosophy of religion.

the verdict
INSUFFICIENT LEANING
Recorded sources
3 sources for · 0 against

Counts group repeated records of the same source within each side. They do not measure evidence strength or source independence.

The retrieved evidence partially discusses the intuitive intellect within Kantian philosophy and its relation to the divine mind, but does not fully establish how the broader philosophy of religion accepts it as epistemically possible.

The analysis

rails:sufficiency:partial_only:for=0+3p:against=0+0p | v55:multi_partial_one_side:lean=lean_partial:for:one_sided

The recorded search did not run a separate search for evidence against it.

Evidence for · 3
Recorded source metadata

Kant's Theory of the Intuitive Intellect. 2022. https://doi.org/10.5406/21521026.39.2.05

Abstract Kant's theory of the intuitive intellect has a broad and substantial role in the development and exposition of his critical philosophy. An emphasis on this theory's reception and appropriation on the part of the German idealists has tended to divert attention from Kant's own treatment of the topic. In this essay, I seek an adequate overview of the theory Kant advances in support of his critical enterprise. I examine the nature of the intuitive intellect's object; its epistemic relation to its object; its mode of comprehension; the relationship between these cognitive elements; and I ask which minds Kant regards as intuitive intellects.

See more details
More for · 2
Recorded source metadata

Interpreting Schelling. 2014. http://books.google.com/books?id=gHtxBAAAQBAJ&dq=The+concept+of+an+intuitive+intellect+is+accepted+as+epistemically+possible+in+philosophy+of+religion.&hl=&as_pt=BOOKS&source=gbs_api

... epistemically charged variant of intellectual intuition . This would be a hard charge for Hegel to take and , on the face of it , an even harder one for Schel- ling to make . The typical way that the concept of intellectual intuition ... The first volume on Schelling in English exploring the study of the history of philosophy and core systematic philosophical issues.

Recorded source metadata

Alternate Possibilities, Divine Omniscience and Critique of Judgement §76 | Kantian Review | Cambridge Core. https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/kantian-review/article/alternate-possibilities-divine-omniscience-and-critique-of-judgement-76/385690981439C3893B698CDB48105222

Alternate Possibilities, Divine Omniscience and Critique of Judgement §76 | Kantian Review | Cambridge Core Cambridge Core homepage Search Cambridge Core homepage --- Institution Login Search Hostname: page-component-5db58dd55d-xnzfm Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-06-25T22:21:06.382Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false - English - Français # Alternate Possibilities, Divine Omniscience and Critique of Judgement §76 Published online by Cambridge University Press: 22 June 2021 Show author details --- * --- Article contents - Abstract - Introduction - The problem - Two rejected alternatives - Unrepresented possibles - Divine omniscience - Objections and replies - Conclusion - Footnotes - References Save PDF Save PDF (0.25 mb) View PDF Save to Dropbox Save to Google Drive Save to Kindle Share Cite Rights & Permissions --- ## Abstract A philosophically and historically influential section of the Critique of Judgement presents an ‘intuitive intellect’ as a mind whose representation is limited to what actually exists, and does not extend to mere possibilities. Kant’s paradigmatic instance of such an intellect is however also the divine mind. This com

The paper trail · every fact has a biography
first checked06 Aug 2026
judged → INSUFFICIENT EVIDENCE · 006 Aug 2026
held for human review08 Aug 2026
Anyone with this link can read the claim and its public receipt, including any personal information in that text. Open permanent receipt.
Check your own claim
Challenge the receipt
Requests are recorded for review. This does not start an automatic check or guarantee a response time.
trust me, bro: win the argument, pass the class, survive peer review.

Citation formatting by citeproc-js (Frank Bennett) and the Citation Style Language project. Source and licenses.

This receipt is an automated verdict against our published method · not an opinion about any author or publication.
Terms · Privacy · How verdicts work · Dispute this receipt