trustme.bro/r/…
✓ checked
trust me, bro:
here is the receipt.
the claim
The Celestial Ephemeris Pole has a precise mathematical definition
the verdict
SUPPORTED
the evidence backs this
refutedsupported
the weight of evidence
3 sources for · 0 against

Scientific literature and International Astronomical Union definitions provide precise mathematical and operational frameworks for the Celestial Ephemeris Pole and its successor.

Evidence for · 3
Definition of the Celestial Ephemeris Pole and the Celestial Ephemeris Origin
2000 · cited by 3
Paper [2] discusses the definition and extension of the Celestial Ephemeris Pole (CEP) to achieve microarcsecond accuracy.
See more details
The analysis

The retrieved papers document the precise definitions, extensions, and updates regarding the Celestial Ephemeris Pole (CEP) within geodesy and astronomy. Papers [2], [5], and [7] explicitly discuss the mathematical definitions and reference frames associated with the CEP, supporting the claim that it has a precise definition.

More for · 2
Observations of the Celestial Ephemeris Pole
1995 · cited by 1
Paper [5] defines the celestial ephemeris pole precisely as the north pole of the axis about which the spin parameter is measured.
New Definition for the Celestial Pole and the Celestial Origin in the ICRS
2002 · cited by 0
Paper [7] details the IAU resolutions regarding the reference poles, replacing the CEP with the Celestial Intermediate Pole while maintaining rigorous definitions.
The paper trail · every fact has a biography
first checked04 Aug 2026
judged → SUPPORTED · 7904 Aug 2026
This receipt carries no identity, shared or not. Sharing publishes your connection to it, not your data.
Check your own claim
Challenge the receipt
trust me, bro: win the argument, pass the class, survive peer review.
This receipt is an automated verdict against our published method · not an opinion about any author or publication.
Terms · Privacy · How verdicts work · Dispute this receipt