The Mandate for Syria and the Lebanon (French: Mandat pour la Syrie et le Liban; Arabic: الانتداب الفرنسي على سوريا ولبنان, romanized: al-intidāb al-faransī ʻalā sūriyā wa-lubnān, also referred to as the Levant States; 1923−1946) was a League of Nations mandate founded in the aftermath of the First World War and the partitioning of the Ottoman Empire, concerning the territories of Syria and Lebano
Th…
The Mandate for Syria and the Lebanon (French: Mandat pour la Syrie et le Liban; Arabic: الانتداب الفرنسي على سوريا ولبنان, romanized: al-intidāb al-faransī ʻalā sūriyā wa-lubnān, also referred to as the Levant States; 1923−1946) was a League of Nations mandate founded in the aftermath of the First World War and the partitioning of the Ottoman Empire, concerning the territories of Syria and Lebanon. The mandate system was supposed to differ from colonialism, with the governing country intended to act as a trustee until the inhabitants were considered eligible for self-government. At that point, the mandate would terminate and a sovereign state would be born.
During the two years that followed the end of the war in 1918—and in accordance with the Sykes–Picot Agreement signed by the United Kingdom and France during the war—the British held control of most of Ottoman Iraq (now Iraq) and the southern part of Ottoman Syria (now Israel, Palestine and Jordan), while the French controlled the rest of Ottoman Syria (including Lebanon, Alexandretta, and portions of Cilicia). In the early 1920s, British and French control of these territories became formalized by the League of Nations' mandate system. And on 29 September 1923 France was assigned the League of Nations mandate of Syria, which included the territory of present-day Lebanon and Alexandretta in addition to modern Syria. The League of Nations monitored the mandates through the Permanent Mandates Commission (PMC). The PMC allowed other states to voice their thoughts on the management of the mandates, such as in economic matters.
The administration of the region under the French was carried out through a number of different governments and territories, including the Syrian Federation (1922–1924), the State of Syria (1925-1930) and the Mandatory Syrian Republic (1930–1946), as well as smaller states: Greater Lebanon, the Alawite State, and the Jabal Druze State. Hatay State was annexed by Turkey in 1939. The French mandate lasted until 1946, when French troops eventually left Syria and Lebanon, which had both declared independence during World War II.
Unrest erupted in Syria when Faisal accepted a compromise with French Prime Minister Clemenceau. Anti-Hashemite demonstrations broke out, and Muslim inhabitants in and around Mount Lebanon revolted in fear of being incorporated into a new, mainly Christian, state of Greater Lebanon. A part of France's claim to these territories in the Levant was that France had been acknowledged as a protector of the minority Christian communities by the Ottoman Empire.
In March 1920, the Congress in Damascus adopted a resolution rejecting the Faisal-Clemenceau accords. The congress declared the independence of Syria in her natural borders (including Southern Syria or Palestine), and proclaimed Faisal the king of all Arabs. Faisal invited Ali Rikabi to form a government. The congress also proclaimed political and economic union with neighboring Iraq and demanded its independence as well.
On 25 April, the supreme inter-Allied council, which was formulating
France responded to these decisions with violent suppression, along with the Maronite patriarchate of Mount Lebanon, which denounced the decisions as a "coup d'état". In Beirut, the Christian press expressed its hostility to the decisions of Faisal's government. Lebanese nationalists used the crisis against Faisal's government to convene a council of Christian figures in Baabda that proclaimed the independence of Lebanon on 22 March 1920.
On 14 July 1920, General Gouraud issued an ultimatum to Faisal, giving him the choice between submission or abdication. Realizing that the power balance was not in his favor, Faisal chose to cooperate. However, the young minister of war, Yusuf al-Azma, refused to comply. In the resulting Franco-Syrian War, Syrian troops under al-Azmeh, composed of the little remaining troops of the Arab army along with Bedouin horsemen and civilian volunteers, met the better trained 12,000-strong French forces under General Mariano Goybet at the Battle of Maysaloun. The French won the battle in less than a day and Azmeh died on the battlefield, along with many of the Syrian troops, while the remaining troops possibly defected. General Goybet captured Damascus with little resistance on 24 July 1920, and the mandate was written in London two years later on 24 July 1922.
Already in 1921, the French wanted to develop the agricultural sector and over a feasibility study of the Union Economique de Syrie the North-East Syrian and the Alawite State were deemed profitable for the cotton cultivation. Investments began in 1924, but it took until the 1930s to produce more than the level reached in 1925. Due to the high economic integration of the region, a trade separation would have harmed both mandates. In order to maintain the economic ties established in the region during Ottoman times the British and the French agreed to a customs-free zone between their mandates in 1921, even though this decision was protested by French manufacturers. The population of Palestine, Syria and Lebanon were strongly in favor of the customs-free zone and successfully protested against a possible abolition in 1927. This affected: local and imported goods, processed goods and goods currently in transit. By 1933, Palestine was the largest importer of Syrian goods, while the French held a share of 7.5% of the imports. Between the two World Wars, France became the largest trader of goods of the French Mandate. From 1933 onwards, Japan was also a large source for imports.
Mr Malcolm MacDonald, British Colonial Secretary, flew 350 miles from Geneva to Paris to keep a luncheon engagement with M.Mandel, the French Colonial Minister._x000D_ Mr Malcolm MacDonald was visiting Geneva to present Britain's Palestine plan to the League Mandates Commission and is flying back after the luncheon._x000D_ Photo Shows: Mr. Malcolm MacDonald (right) with M. Mandel in Paris._x000D_ 19 June 1939_x000D_
"Locating Palestine’s Summer Residence: Mandate Tourism and National Id" by Andrea L. Stanton --> Skip to main content Home About FAQ My Account < Previous Next > Home > Arts, Humanities and Social Sciences > Religious Studies > Faculty Scholarship > 13 Religious Studies: Faculty Scholarship Locating Palestine’s Summer Residence: Mandate Tourism and National Identity Authors Andrea L. Stanton , University of Denver Follow Publication Date Winter 2018 Document Type Article Abstract The carving up of the Ottoman Levant into British and French Mandates after World War I introduced new realities for the inhabitants of the region.
This article uses Lebanese tourism and the promotion of Lebanon as a tourist destination to Palestinians of all religious backgrounds as a case study to investigate the challenges and potentials of the new Mandate structures. Using Palestinian government archives and newspapers, it examines how Lebanon was marketed to Palestinian vacationers. It concludes by suggesting that tourism, with its mixture of private and government sector interests, serves as a key node for observing the messy process of relational identities when two sets of neighbors worked to reframe themselves in national terms.
Copyright Statement / License for Reuse This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License Rights Holder Andrea L. Stanton Provenance Received from author File Format application/pdf Language English (eng) Extent 19 pgs File Size 5.7 MB Publication Statement Copyright held by the author or publisher. User is responsible for all copyright compliance. Publication Title Journal of Palestine Studies Volume 47 First Page 44 Last Page 62 ISSN 1533-8614 Recommended Citation Stanton, A. L. (2018). Locating Palestine’s summer residence: Mandate tourism and national identity. Journal of Palestine Studies, 47(2), 44-62.
https://doi.org/10.1525/jps.2018.47.2.44 DOI Link https://doi.org/10.1525/jps.2018.47.2.44 Comments Original publication may be viewed at https://doi.org/10.1525/jps.2018.47.2.44 Download DOWNLOADS Since March 07, 2018 Included in Islamic Studies Commons , Islamic World and Near East History Commons Share COinS Search Enter search terms: Select context to search: in this series in this repository across all repositories Advanced Search Notify me via email or RSS Browse Collections Disciplines Authors Author Corner Author FAQ Elsevier - Digital Commons Home | About | FAQ | My Account | Accessibility Statement Privacy Copyright
Everything we examined (4)
This check searched the claim as stated. It did not run a separate search for evidence against it.