trustme.bro/r/…
✓ checked
trust me, bro:
here is the receipt.
the claim
The brightness of an incandescent bulb remains constant over time under steady electrical power
the verdict
SUPPORTED
the evidence backs this
refutedsupported
the weight of evidence
1 source for · 0 against
AS REPORTEDno primary record reached; this is what the reporting says

An Encyclopædia Britannica reference source reports that an incandescent lamp preserved a constancy in illuminating power at a constant voltage.

Evidence for · 1
cited by 0
The most convenient practical working standard is an incandescent lamp run at a high temperature, that is, at an efficiency of about 21/2 watts per candle. If it has a sufficiently large bulb, and has been aged by being worked for some time previously, it will at a constant voltage preserve a constancy in illuminating power sufficiently long to make the necessary photometric comparisons, and it can itself be compared at intervals with another standard incandescent lamp, or with a flame standard such as a Harcourt pentane lamp. In measuring the candle-power of arc lamps it is necessary to have some arrangement by which the brightness of the rays proceeding from the arc in different directions can be measured. For this purpose the lamp may be suspended from a support, and a radial arm arranged to carry three mirrors, so that in whatever position the arm may be placed, it gathers light proceeding at one particular angle above or below the horizon from the arc, and this light is reflected out finally in a constant horizontal direction.
See more details
The analysis

rails:sufficiency:supported:single_source:for=1+0p:against=0+0p | v55:sufficiency

Everything we examined (1)
This check searched the claim as stated. It did not run a separate search for evidence against it.
  1. Wikisource: 1911 Encyclopædia Britannica/Lightingreferenceno side taken
The paper trail · every fact has a biography
first checked01 Aug 2026
judged → COMMON KNOWLEDGE · 9501 Aug 2026
This receipt carries no identity, shared or not. Sharing publishes your connection to it, not your data.
Check your own claim
Challenge the receipt
trust me, bro: win the argument, pass the class, survive peer review.
This receipt is an automated verdict against our published method · not an opinion about any author or publication.
Terms · Privacy · How verdicts work · Dispute this receipt