trustme.bro/r/…
✓ checked
trust me, bro:
here is the receipt.
the claim
The anode heel effect occurs in x-ray tubes with un-angled anodes
the verdict
REFUTED
the evidence says no
refutedsupported
the weight of evidence
0 sources for · 2 against

Peer-reviewed literature demonstrates that the anode heel effect is dependent on the angle of the anode target and decreases as the target angle increases, refuting the claim that it occurs in x-ray tubes with un-angled anodes.

Evidence against · 2
2012 · cited by 0
This study aimed to evaluate the anode heel effect on the x-ray machine for the variation of angle of anode target and tube potential. The research was conducted using Monte Carlo simulations with the EGSnrc package. The x ray was designed by BEAMnrc, whereas the phase space file was analyzed by BEAMDP. The x ray unit was designed by using Tungsten material in anoda structure. Total filtration that used was equivalent with 2,5 mm Aluminium. From the simulation found that the anode heel effect occurs only on an axis parallel to the axis x-ray tube, i.e. fluence of radiation on the cathode side is greater than the anode side. Provided that a larger angle of target will decrease the anode heel effect. Anode heel effect for angle variation on the voltage 80 kV were 17,25% (50), 15,65% (7,50), 14,65% (100), 6,96% (12,50), and 3,14% (150) respectively. As for variations in tube voltage was obtained that the anode heel effect is relatively small. Anode heel effect for the tube voltage variation on the tube anode angle 150 were 1.99% (40 kV), 2.20% (60 kV), 3.14 (80 kV), and 3.81% (100 kV) respectively.
See more details
The analysis

rails:sufficiency:refuted:single_source:for=0+0p:against=1+0p | v55:sufficiency

More against · 1
2012 · cited by 0
This study aimed to evaluate the anode heel effect on the x-ray machine for the variation of angle of anode target and tube potential. The research was conducted using Monte Carlo simulations with the EGSnrc package. The x ray was designed by BEAMnrc, whereas the phase space file was analyzed by BEAMDP. The x ray unit was designed by using Tungsten material in anoda structure. Total filtration that used was equivalent with 2,5 mm Aluminium. From the simulation found that the anode heel effect occurs only on an axis parallel to the axis x-ray tube, i.e. fluence of radiation on the cathode side is greater than the anode side. Provided that a larger angle of target will decrease the anode heel effect. Anode heel effect for angle variation on the voltage 80 kV were 17,25% (50), 15,65% (7,50), 14,65% (100), 6,96% (12,50), and 3,14% (150) respectively. As for variations in tube voltage was obtained that the anode heel effect is relatively small. Anode heel effect for the tube voltage variation on the tube anode angle 150 were 1.99% (40 kV), 2.20% (60 kV), 3.14 (80 kV), and 3.81% (100 kV) respectively.
Everything we examined (2) — 1 independent source
This check searched the claim as stated. It did not run a separate search for evidence against it.
  1. SIMULASI MONTE CARLO UNTUK EVALUASI ANODE HEEL EFFECT PADA PESAWAT SINAR-X MENGGUNAKAN PAKET PROGRAM EGSnrcpeer-reviewedsame source L1no side taken
  2. SIMULASI MONTE CARLO UNTUK EVALUASI ANODE HEEL EFFECT PADA PESAWAT SINAR-X MENGGUNAKAN PAKET PROGRAM EGSnrcpeer-reviewedsame source L1no side taken
The paper trail · every fact has a biography
first checked04 Aug 2026
judged → REFUTED · 2704 Aug 2026
This receipt carries no identity, shared or not. Sharing publishes your connection to it, not your data.
Check your own claim
Challenge the receipt
trust me, bro: win the argument, pass the class, survive peer review.
This receipt is an automated verdict against our published method · not an opinion about any author or publication.
Terms · Privacy · How verdicts work · Dispute this receipt