Phase change materials (PCMs) can store thermal energy as latent heat through phase transitions. PCMs using the solid-liquid phase transition offer high 100–300 J g−1 enthalpy at constant temperature. However, pure compounds suffer from leakage, incongruent melting and crystallization, phase separation, and supercooling, which limit their heat storage capacity and reliability during multiple heating-cooling cycles. An appropriate approach to mitigating these drawbacks is the construction of composites as shape-stabilized phase change materials which retain their macroscopic solid shape even at temperatures above the melting point of the active heat storage compound. Shape-stabilized materials can be obtained by PCMs impregnation into porous matrices. Porous silica nanomaterials are promising matrices due to their high porosity and adsorption capacity, chemical and thermal stability and possibility of changing their structure through chemical synthesis. This review offers a first in-depth look at the various methods for obtaining composite PCMs using porous silica nanomaterials, their properties, and applications. The synthesis and properties of porous silica composites are presented based on the main classes of compounds which can act as heat storage materials (paraffins, fatty acids, polymers, small organic molecules, hydrated salts, molten salts and metals). The physico-chemical phenomena arising from the nanoconfinement of phase change materials into the silica pores are discussed from both theoretical and practical standpoints. The lessons learned so far in designing efficient composite PCMs using porous silica matrices are presented, as well as the future perspectives on improving the heat storage materials.
This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ ). Phase change materials (PCMs) can store thermal energy as latent heat through phase transitions. PCMs using the solid-liquid phase transition offer high 100–300 J g −1 enthalpy at constant temperature. However, pure compounds suffer from leakage, incongruent melting and crystallization, phase separation, and supercooling, which limit their heat storage capacity and reliability during multiple heating-cooling cycles.
Applications of thermal energy storage range from passively heated and cooled building, waste heat reutilization and renewable energy storage to creating better thermal insulation of transplant organs, food or electronics and battery heat management. One of the most promising technologies for thermal energy storage is comprised of phase change materials (PCMs), which can reversibly store large amounts of heat and cold at constant operating temperature. The use of pure compounds as PCMs has a number of drawbacks, such as leakage during use, poor reliability during multiple operating cycles, corrosiveness, flammability, etc.
Liquid water has one of the highest specific heats, at 4.184 J g −1 K −1 . However, water remains liquid in a short temperature range, so cheaper materials with high thermal stability ranges but low c p , such as concrete or rock, are also employed for sensible heat storage [ 3 ]. Latent heat storage relies on the energy exchange which takes place during a phase transition such as melting/crystallization or evaporation/condensation. Latent heat storage can accommodate large heat storage capacities at constant temperature. Materials used for latent storage are called phase change materials (PCM). Finally, chemical heat storage involves the reaction enthalpy to be used for heat storage.
Specific heat capacity, the operating temperature range, cost, and density are thus the most important characteristics of a sensible heat storage material ( Table 1 ). In contrast, latent heat storage offers higher energy densities at constant operating temperature. PCMs for latent storage can in theory use any phase transition between solid, liquid and gas phases. However, the change in volume accompanying the gas phase is very large, greatly reducing the volumetric storage capacity of such a system. In practice, only transitions between solid and liquid phases are employed.
High volume change can lead in time to decreased contact area between the thermal energy storage materials and the heat transfer surfaces, thus diminishing both the energy and power densities. Other problems such as leakage are also associated with this volume change. The materials should also have low vapor pressure inside the operating temperature range. While encapsulation into porous silica can control the leakage of molten PCMs, evaporation remains a potential problem, especially in the case of organic materials. High crystallization rates and low supercooling degrees are also desired, as the crystallization process is hampered due to nanoconfinement effects [ 63 ].
Metals, Alloys and Elemental PCMs Metals and alloys can be used as PCMs. While most metals have low gravimetric heat of fusion, their high density makes them attractive for applications requiring high volumetric heat storage. There are only a few reports to date on the synthesis and characterization of metal-porous silica composites. A mixture of Ge and Sn embedded into a silica matrix was found to exhibit different melting and crystallization behavior, depending on heating and cooling rate [ 200 ]. Under fast temperature change rates the nanocrystals formed an alloy, while slow rates resulted in a more thermodynamically favored state of separated metal phases.
More complex determinations are based on geometric considerations of the pore shape or volume, determined from porosimetry measurements. Both methods allow for the determination of theoretical enthalpy lost due to the non-melting layer and the enthalpy of the nanoconfined phase. In practice, a part of the pore volume remains empty due to the difference between the molar volume of the
Abstract Energy storage mechanisms enhance the energy efficiency of systems by decreasing the difference between source and demand. For this reason, phase change materials are particularly attractive because of their ability to provide high energy storage density at a constant temperature (latent heat) that corresponds to the temperature of the phase transition of the material. In this study, the melting process of PCM (Phase Change Material) for thermal energy storage is simulated numerically. Melting of PCM which selects paraffin wax with triangular internal walls in rectangular heat exchanger is used. Hot air enters inside the PCM heat exchanger with laminar flow. Three-dimensional model is used and the simulations are performed by using ANSYS (Fluent) 15.0 code. The influence of the melting process for PCM on the heat exchanger performance is analyzed. The modeling results show that, the melting process is increased with increase time stage and fluid mass flow. For all different air mass flow, an increase in the heat transfer rate of air is obtained at the initial stage (in 60 s) followed by a decrease during the following melting process. The numerical analysis also shows that, the enhancement in the heat transfer rate reached 26 W for time 60 s at Re = 2000. To complete the melting process (sensible storage), the time required is 295 s at Re = 2000 and at the heat transfer rate of about 18 W, while it required 485 s at Re = 500 for the heat transfer rate of about 10 W.
The advantages of latent heat storage systems are heat storage materials capable of providing large energy storage densities and are capable of storing heat at almost constant temperature according to the transition temperature at each phase change. The thermophysical properties of phase change material (PCM) materials are important to know before they are applied in a variety of uses. The thermophysical properties of PCM materials are very important to note i.e. melting point, super cooling temperature, latent heat, heat type and thermal conductivity of the PCM material. Methods of determining the thermophysical properties of PCM materials that have been widely used are differential thermal analysis (DTA), differential scanning calorimetry (DSC), and calorimetry. These three methods have weaknesses. DTA and DSC methods that have very small test samples (110 mg) cause the materials thermophysical properties to be different when used in larger quantities. Another disadvantage is that DTA and DSC measurement equipment is complex and expensive, and cannot measure latent heat, specific heat and thermal conductivity of multiple PCM samples simultaneously. The weakness of the calorimetry method is the process of changing the two phases of PCM that is difficult to observe. T-history method that uses simple equipment has been widely used at this time. In this research, we will use T-History method to measure the thermophysical properties of phase change materials that will be used as heat storage material in solar water heating system. The material is: paraffin, beeswax, cow fat, and mixture of the material with a certain ratio. From the test, results can be concluded that the use of T-History method gives good results with a difference of 7% with the measurement results using DSC.
Everything we examined (3)
This check searched the claim as stated. It did not run a separate search for evidence against it.