trustme.bro/r/…
✓ checked
trust me, bro:
here is the receipt.
the claim
Tabannusi is attested in cuneiform script records
the verdict
CONTESTED
contested - the weight sits with the supporting side
refutedsupported
the weight of evidence
1 source for · 0 against
AS REPORTEDno primary record reached; this is what the reporting says

Retrieved records acknowledge the term tabannusi in relation to cuneiform script, but the listed source does not provide sufficient text or context to fully support the claim.

Evidence for · 1
cited by 0
# Tabannusi in cuneiform script Tags: written-language, cuneiform, akkadian - Score: 3 - Views: 374 - Answers: 2 - Answered: yes - Asked by: Marek Lothrain (47 rep) - Asked: 2020-12-11 - Edited: 2020-12-11 - Site: linguistics ## Question I'd like to know how to correctly write a word "tabannusi" (build) in sumerian alphabet. Is there a chance then anyone can help me? ## Answers ### Answer by Ilmari Karonen (score: 11) As noted by Draconis, this is not a Sumerian but an Akkadian word, specifically a form of the verb banû, "to build". Specifically, I would analyze it as the G-durative (for the D-stem, the 2nd person prefix should be tu- instead of ta-) with a subjunctive marker -u- and an enclitic second person feminine object pronoun -ši,1 i.e. as tabanni+u+ši → tabannûši = "you (male2) will build (or are building) her/it (referring to a female person or to a grammatically female noun)". And, since the û is overlong (arising from a contracted diphtong) I would diverge slightly from Draconis's suggestion and spell it plene, i.e. as ta-ba-an-nu-ú-ši = 𒋫𒁀𒀭𒉡𒌑𒅆.3 In fact, I googled for the word and found that it occurs with that exact spelling in the Tale of Atra-ḫasīs, tab
See more details
The analysis

rails:sufficiency:supported:single_source:for=1+0p:against=0+0p | v55:sufficiency | v55:coherence_repaired:what=both

Everything we examined (1)
This check searched the claim as stated. It did not run a separate search for evidence against it.
  1. Tabannusi in cuneiform scriptreferenceno side taken
The paper trail · every fact has a biography
first checked04 Aug 2026
judged → INSUFFICIENT EVIDENCE · 004 Aug 2026
held for human review08 Aug 2026
This receipt carries no identity, shared or not. Sharing publishes your connection to it, not your data.
Check your own claim
Challenge the receipt
trust me, bro: win the argument, pass the class, survive peer review.
This receipt is an automated verdict against our published method · not an opinion about any author or publication.
Terms · Privacy · How verdicts work · Dispute this receipt