trustme.bro/r/…
✓ checked
trust me, bro:
here is the receipt.
the claim
Systematic under- or over-estimation of general knowledge quantities is driven by specific cognitive biases.
the verdict
SUPPORTED
the evidence backs this
confidence 88/100

Multiple studies demonstrate that systematic misestimations of quantities are driven by specific cognitive biases such as quantity insensitivity, attribute substitution, and operational momentum.

Evidence for · 3
How social information can improve estimation accuracy in human groups
2017 · cited by 112
Paper [1] notes that human judgment features systematic cognitive biases causing underestimation of quantities, which can be counterbalanced by social influence.
See more details
More for · 2
Environmental impact judgments of meat, vegetarian, and insect burgers: Unifying the negative footprint illusion and quantity insensitivity
2019 · cited by 53
Paper [4] demonstrates that quantity insensitivity and the negative footprint illusion are specific cognitive biases that drive systematic estimation errors in environmental impact judgments.
Operational momentum in multiplication and division?
2014 · cited by 15
Paper [8] shows that numerical estimation biases such as operational momentum lead to the systematic over- or under-estimation of mathematical quantities based on problem type.
The paper trail · every fact has a biography
first checked01 Aug 2026
judged → SUPPORTED · 8801 Aug 2026
This receipt carries no identity, shared or not. Sharing publishes your connection to it, not your data.
Check your own claim
Challenge the receipt
trust me, bro: win the argument, pass the class, survive peer review.
This receipt is an automated verdict against our published method · not an opinion about any author or publication.
Terms · Privacy · How verdicts work · Dispute this receipt