Syntactic structures contribute directly to semantic interpretation.
the verdict
SUPPORTED
the evidence backs this
refutedsupported
the weight of evidence
3 sources for · 0 against
Reference sources indicate that formal semantics relies on syntactic structure and mapping rules to determine sentence meaning, showing that syntactic structures contribute directly to semantic interpretation.
which undergoes semantic interpretation. In these approaches, apparent mismatches between form and meaning can be explained using syntactic mechanisms such
Formal semantics is the scientific study of linguistic meaning through formal tools from logic and mathematics. It is an interdisciplinary field, sometimes regarded as a subfield of both linguistics and philosophy of language. Formal semanticists rely on diverse methods to analyze natural language. Many examine the meaning of a sentence by studying the circumstances in which it would be true. They
The meaning of a sentence depends in part on its syntactic structure. For instance, the sentences "John saw Mary" and "Mary saw John" contain the same words but have different meanings because they differ in their syntactic structure. Thus, theories of compositional semantics will provide interpretation rules that map syntactic trees to their meanings. The nature of these rules depends in part on which model of syntax is assumed. Many theories of semantics assume a generative model of syntax, such as government and binding theory or minimalism, while other common approaches include categorial grammar and HPSG.
In such theories, the interpretation system often uses rules such as the following. These rules specify how to start with a syntactic node
α
{\displaystyle \alpha }
and calculate its denotation, written
[
[
α
]
]
{\displaystyle [\![\alpha ]\!]}
. These rules are applied recursively.
F…
As additional cues other than syntactic structure were provided, performance level increased. All groups, including the Broca's aphasics, showed only slight improvement with the presence of morphological cues. Wernicke's aphasic's performance was particularly vulnerable when lexical cues were added to syntactic cues. These results suggest that evaluation of a patient's deficit in sentence comprehension requires analysis of those attributes of the sentence contributing to its overall semantic interpretation. Published in Brain and language (1983)
surface form can be semantically ambiguous between different scope construals. Some theories of scope posit a level of syntactic structure called logical form
In formal semantics, the scope of a semantic operator is the semantic object to which it applies. For instance, in the sentence "Paulina doesn't drink beer but she does drink wine," the proposition that Paulina drinks beer occurs within the scope of negation, but the proposition that Paulina drinks wine does not. Scope can be thought of as the semantic order of operations.
One of the major concer
In formal semantics, the scope of a semantic operator is the semantic object to which it applies. For instance, in the sentence "Paulina doesn't drink beer but she does drink wine," the proposition that Paulina drinks beer occurs within the scope of negation, but the proposition that Paulina drinks wine does not. Scope can be thought of as the semantic order of operations.
One of the major concerns of research in formal semantics is the relationship between operators' syntactic positions and their semantic scope. This relationship is not transparent, since the scope of an operator need not directly correspond to its surface position and a single surface form can be semantically ambiguous between different scope construals. Some theories of scope posit a level of syntactic structure called logical form, in which an item's syntactic position corresponds to its semantic scope. Others theories compute scope relations in the semantics itself, using formal tools such as type shifters, monads, and continuations.
Hypothesis about scope and domain: The semantic scope of an operator corresponds to the position of the item which expresses it at some…
Everything we examined (3) — 2 independent sources
This check searched the claim as stated. It did not run a separate search for evidence against it.