trustme.bro/r/…
✓ checked
trust me, bro:
here is the receipt.
the claim
Supernovae last for a characteristic duration of time
the verdict
SUPPORTED
the evidence backs this
refutedsupported
the weight of evidence
5 sources for · 0 against

Supernovae exhibit characteristic temporal behaviors, including distinct rise times, decline rates, and plateau phases that astronomers routinely measure and model to classify different types of stellar explosions.

Evidence for · 5
The Type I Superluminous Supernova Catalog I: Light Curve Properties, Models, and Catalog Description
2024 · cited by 24
Analyzes rise and decline timescales across a large catalog of supernovae.
See more details
The analysis

The retrieved papers consistently demonstrate that supernovae follow characteristic durations, light curve timescales, plateau phases, and decline rates that can be systematically modeled and categorized across various types of supernovae. There is no contradictory evidence presented regarding whether supernovae have characteristic durations.

More for · 4
Diversity in Hydrogen-rich Envelope Mass of Type II Supernovae. I. Plateau Phase Light-curve Modeling
2024 · cited by 11
Models the plateau phase duration of Type II supernovae.
SN 2015as: A low luminosity Type IIb supernova without an early light curve peak
2018 · cited by 11
Monitors the light curve and characteristic timescales of a specific supernova.
A Systematic Study of Superluminous Supernova Light-curve Models Using Clustering
2019 · cited by 10
Examines light-curve timescales and shape properties to characterize supernova diversity.
Long Plateau Doth So: How Internal Heating Sources Affect Hydrogen-rich Supernova Light Curves
2024 · cited by 6
Investigates the factors affecting the duration of the hydrogen recombination plateau phase.
Everything we examined (12)
  1. The Type I Superluminous Supernova Catalog I: Light Curve Properties, Models, and Catalog Descriptionpeer-reviewedsupports
  2. Diversity in Hydrogen-rich Envelope Mass of Type II Supernovae. I. Plateau Phase Light-curve Modelingpeer-reviewedsupports
  3. SN 2015as: A low luminosity Type IIb supernova without an early light curve peakpeer-reviewedsupports
  4. A Systematic Study of Superluminous Supernova Light-curve Models Using Clusteringpeer-reviewedsupports
  5. Strong Gravitational Lensing and Microlensing of Supernovae.peer-reviewedno side takennot shown: read and judged not to bear on this claim
  6. Accretion timescales and style of asteroidal differentiation in an <sup>26</sup>Al-poor protoplanetary disk.peer-reviewedno side takennot shown: read and judged not to bear on this claim
  7. Long Plateau Doth So: How Internal Heating Sources Affect Hydrogen-rich Supernova Light Curvespeer-reviewedsupports
  8. Spectropolarimetric diagnostics of thermonuclear supernova explosions.peer-reviewedno side takennot shown: read and judged not to bear on this claim
  9. SN 2023vbg: A Type IIn Supernova Resembling SN 2009ip, with a Long-duration Precursor and Early-time Bumppeer-reviewedno side takennot shown: read and judged not to bear on this claim
  10. Magnetar formation through a convective dynamo in protoneutron stars.peer-reviewedno side takennot shown: read and judged not to bear on this claim
  11. Jets Downstream of Collisionless Shocks.peer-reviewedno side takennot shown: read and judged not to bear on this claim
  12. Electromagnetic follow-up of gravitational waves: review and lessons learned.peer-reviewedno side takennot shown: read and judged not to bear on this claim
The paper trail · every fact has a biography
first checked05 Aug 2026
judged → SUPPORTED · 8405 Aug 2026
This receipt carries no identity, shared or not. Sharing publishes your connection to it, not your data.
Check your own claim
Challenge the receipt
trust me, bro: win the argument, pass the class, survive peer review.
This receipt is an automated verdict against our published method · not an opinion about any author or publication.
Terms · Privacy · How verdicts work · Dispute this receipt