trustme.bro/r/…
✓ checked
trust me, bro:
here is the receipt.
the claim
Sulfur hexafluoride acts as a potent greenhouse gas with a long atmospheric lifetime
the verdict
SUPPORTED
the evidence backs this
refutedsupported
the weight of evidence
7 sources for · 0 against

Sulfur hexafluoride is well-established in the scientific literature as an extremely potent greenhouse gas with a very high global warming potential and a remarkably long atmospheric lifetime.

Evidence for · 7
2020 · cited by 136
States that SF6 possesses a considerably higher potential for global warming and longer atmospheric lifetime compared to carbon dioxide.
See more details
The analysis

Every retrieved paper that discusses the atmospheric properties of sulfur hexafluoride confirms that it is a potent greenhouse gas with an exceptionally high global warming potential and long persistence in the atmosphere. There is no contradictory evidence in the provided literature.

More for · 6
2016 · cited by 71
Provides modeled atmospheric lifetimes and high global warming potentials for sulfur hexafluoride.
2025 · cited by 15
Notes that SF6 is a potent greenhouse gas with a high global warming potential and a long atmospheric lifetime.
2026 · cited by 0
Identifies SF6 as the most potent greenhouse gas known, with an exceptionally high global warming potential and atmospheric lifetime.
2025 · cited by 0
Highlights the extreme global warming potential of sulfur hexafluoride used as a tamponade agent in surgery.
2025 · cited by 0
Describes SF6 as a highly potent greenhouse gas with a very high global warming potential.
2025 · cited by 0
Describes SF6 as a potent greenhouse gas characterized by a high global warming potential and long lifetime.
The paper trail · every fact has a biography
first checked04 Aug 2026
judged → SUPPORTED · 8804 Aug 2026
This receipt carries no identity, shared or not. Sharing publishes your connection to it, not your data.
Check your own claim
Challenge the receipt
trust me, bro: win the argument, pass the class, survive peer review.
This receipt is an automated verdict against our published method · not an opinion about any author or publication.
Terms · Privacy · How verdicts work · Dispute this receipt