Statins have been responsible for a major reduction in cardiovascular disease.
the verdict
SUPPORTED
the evidence backs this
refutedsupported
the weight of evidence
6 sources for · 0 against
Peer-reviewed literature and reference sources indicate that statins play a major role in reducing cardiovascular risk and preventing cardiovascular events.
<h4>Importance</h4>The association between statin-induced reduction in low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) levels and the absolute risk reduction of individual, rather than composite, outcomes, such as all-cause mortality, myocardial infarction, or stroke, is unclear.<h4>Objective</h4>To assess the association between absolute reductions in LDL-C levels with treatment with statin therapy and all-cause mortality, myocardial infarction, and stroke to facilitate shared decision-making between clinicians and patients and inform clinical guidelines and policy.<h4>Data sources</h4>PubMed and Embase were searched to identify eligible trials from January 1987 to June 2021.<h4>Study selection</h4>Large randomized clinical trials that examined the effectiveness of statins in reducing total mortality and cardiovascular outcomes with a planned duration of 2 or more years and that reported absolute changes in LDL-C levels. Interventions were treatment with statins (3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl coenzyme A reductase inhibitors) vs placebo or usual care. Participants were men and women older than 18 years.<h4>Data extraction and synthesis</h4>Three independent reviewers extracted data and/or assessed the methodological quality and certainty of the evidence using the risk of bias 2 tool and Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation. Any differences in opinion were resolved by consensus. Meta-analyses and a meta-regression were undertaken.<h4>Main outcomes and measures</h4>Primary outcome: all-cause mortality. Secondary outcomes: myocardial infarction, stroke.<h4>Findings</h4>Twenty-one trials were included in the analysis. Meta-analyses showed reductions in the absolute risk of 0.8% (95% CI, 0.4%-1.2%) for all-cause mortality, 1.3% (95% CI, 0.9%-1.7%) for myocardial infarction, and 0.4% (95% CI, 0.2%-0.6%) for stroke in those randomized to treatment with statins, with associated relative risk reductions of 9% (95% CI, 5%-14%), 29% (95% CI, 22%-34%), and 14% (95% CI, 5%-22%) respectively. A meta-regression exploring the potential mediating association of the magnitude of statin-induced LDL-C reduction with outcomes was inconclusive.<h4>Conclusions and relevance</h4>The results of this meta-analysis suggest that the absolute risk reductions of treatment with statins in terms of all-cause mortality, myocardial infarction, and stroke are modest compared with the relative risk reductions, and the presence of significant heterogeneity reduces the certainty of the evidence. A conclusive association between absolute reductions in LDL-C levels and individual clinical outcomes was not established, and these findings underscore the importance of discussing absolute risk reductions when making informed clinical decisions with individual patients.
Statins are a main curbstone in the prevention of cardiovascular disease (CVD), pandemic in 21st century. CVD displays evident sex and gender differences, not only in clinical manifestation and outcomes but also in pharmacological treatment. Whether statin therapy should be differentially prescribed according to sex is a matter of debate. Aside a different pharmacological action, statins are not proven to be less effective in one gender comparing to the other, nor to be less safe. Nevertheless, up to date evidence shows that statins have not been adequately tested in women, especially in primary prevention trials. Since data-lacking, making a treatment decision on women is potentially harmful, although female individuals represent the majority of the population and they have a greater lifetime CVD risk. Therefore, adequately powered randomized control trials with longer follow-up are warranted to establish if a benefit on CV events and mortality prevention exists in both sexes. The aim of the present review is to summarize the sex and gender differences in statin use: it raises concerns and updates perspectives towards an evidence-based and sex-tailored prevention of CVD management.
<h4>Objective</h4>To synthesise evidence from exclusively primary prevention data on the effectiveness of statins for prevention of cardiovascular disease (CVD), including stroke, and outcomes stratified by baseline risk and gender.<h4>Design</h4>Overview of systematic reviews (SRs) using Revised-AMSTAR approach to assess quality.<h4>Data sources</h4>Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, MEDLINE, Embase, PubMed, Scopus and PROSPERO to June 2017.<h4>Eligibility criteria for selecting studies</h4>SRs of randomised control trials (RCTs) or individual patient data (IPD) from RCTs, examining the effectiveness of statins versus placebo or no treatment on all-cause mortality, coronary heart disease, CVD (including stroke) and composite endpoints, with stratification by baseline risk and gender.<h4>Data extraction and synthesis</h4>Two independent reviewers extracted data and assessed methodological quality. A narrative synthesis was conducted.<h4>Results</h4>Three SRs were included. Quality of included SRs was mixed, and none reported on the risk of bias of included trials.We found trends towards reduced all-cause mortality in all SRs (RR 0.91 [95% CI 0.85 to 0.97]), (RR 0.91 [95% CI 0.83 to 1.01]) and (RR 0.78 [95% CI 0.53 to 1.15]) though it was not statistically significant in two SRs. When stratified by baseline risk, the effect on all-cause mortality was no longer statistically significant except in one medium risk category. One review reported significant reductions (RR 0.85 [95% CI 0.77 to 0.95]) in vascular deaths and non-significant reductions in non-vascular deaths (RR 0.97 [95% CI 0.88 to 1.07]). There were significant reductions in composite outcomes overall, but mixed results were reported in these when stratified by baseline risk. These reviews included studies with participants considered risk equivalent to those with established CVD.<h4>Conclusions</h4>There is limited evidence on the effectiveness of statins for primary prevention with mixed findings from studies including participants with widely ranging baseline risks. Decision making for the use of statins should consider individual baseline risk, absolute risk reduction and whether risk reduction justifies potential harms and taking a daily medicine for life.<h4>Trial registration number</h4>CRD42017064761.
This review considers the evidence showing that statins can prevent first or recurrent stroke or improve its outcome in subjects at moderate or high risk for cardiovascular disease (CVD). Data are reviewed according to trial design (observational or prospective) and baseline CVD risk. Two (ASCOT, CARDS) out of five primary CVD prevention statin trials showed a considerable reduction in stroke rates. In two (MIRACL and PROVE IT) out of five acute coronary syndrome trials, the prevention of first stroke was significant. Most secondary prevention trials (4S, CARE, LIPID, HPS, GREACE and TNT) showed a beneficial effect of statins in stroke prevention. Finally, SPARCL, the only secondary stroke prevention trial in subjects without overt coronary heart disease (CHD), showed a significant reduction in total and ischaemic (fatal and nonfatal) stroke rate, although a small but significant increase in nonfatal haemorrhagic stroke was noted. There was also a significant reduction in CHD-related events. The possible mechanisms responsible for statin-associated stroke prevention are discussed. The evidence suggests the need to consider early and long-term statin treatment (with substantial low-density lipoprotein cholesterol reduction) in all patients at high risk of any type of major vascular event, without discriminating CHD from stroke. Thus, statins may be beneficial to both the heart and the brain.
3-Hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl coenzyme A reductase inhibitors (statins) are the most widely prescribed drugs worldwide for lowering cholesterol levels. In use for more than 15 years, they have demonstrated efficacy, safety, and tolerability across a broad range of patients. This class of drugs has been designed to lower the cholesterol level by competitively inhibiting the enzyme responsible for its biosynthesis and thereby to play a major role in reducing cardiovascular risk. However, both basic evidence and clinical evidence also supports the idea that reductions in cardiovascular risk are dependent on mechanisms beyond cholesterol reduction alone, such as the reduction of endothelial dysfunction, inhibition of inflammatory responses, stabilization of atherosclerotic plaques, and modulation of procoagulant activity and platelet function.In fact, as shown in several clinical trials, the beneficial effects of statin treatment begin earlier than its cholesterol-lowering effect. These other mechanisms could act in concert with the potent low-density lipoprotein cholesterol-lowering effects of this class of drugs to exert early and lasting cardiovascular protective effects. Recently, several studies have shown that an intensive lipid-lowering regimen with a statin provides greater protection against death or major cardiovascular events than does a standard regimen.This review summarizes the new findings in these pleiotropic effects and describes their impact on vascular processes.
of cardiovascular disease. Statins are effective in preventing further cardiovascular disease in people with a history of cardiovascular disease. As
Cardiovascular disease (CVD) is any disease involving the heart or blood vessels. CVDs include coronary artery diseases (e.g. angina, heart attack), heart failure, hypertensive heart disease, rheumatic heart disease, cardiomyopathy, arrhythmia, congenital heart disease, valvular heart disease, carditis, aortic aneurysms, peripheral artery disease, thromboembolic disease, and venous thrombosis.
The
P…
Maintaining a healthy diet, such as the Mediterranean diet, a vegetarian, vegan or another plant-based diet.
Replacing saturated fat with healthier choices: a 2017 American Heart Association presidential advisory found that, across pooled randomized controlled trials, replacing saturated fat with polyunsaturated vegetable oil was associated with an approximately 30% reduction in cardiovascular events; prospective observational studies similarly link lower saturated-fat and higher unsaturated-fat intake with lower rates of CVD.
Decrease body fat if overweight or obese. The effect of weight loss is often difficult to distinguish from dietary change, and evidence on weight reducing diets is limited. In observational studies of people with severe obesity, weight loss following bariatric surgery is associated with a 46% reduction in cardiovascular risk.
Limit alcohol consumption to the recommended daily limits. People who moderately consume alcoholic drinks have a 25–30% lower risk of cardiovascular disease. However, people who are genetically predisposed to consume less alcohol have lower rates of cardiovascular disease suggesting that alcohol itself may not be protective. Excessive alcohol intake increases the risk of cardiovascular disease and consumption of alcohol is associated with increased risk of a cardiovascular event in the day following consumption.
Decrease non-HDL cholesterol. Statin treatment reduces cardiovascular mortality by about 31%.
Stopping smoking and avoidance of second-hand smoke. Stopping smoking reduces risk by about 35%.
At least 150 minutes (2 hours and 30 minutes) of moderate exercise per…
Everything we examined (6)
This check searched the claim as stated. It did not run a separate search for evidence against it.