trustme.bro/r/…
✓ checked
trust me, bro:
here is the receipt.
the claim
Static images can induce visual motion illusions due to peripheral drift effects
the verdict
SUPPORTED
the evidence backs this
refutedsupported
the weight of evidence
5 sources for · 0 against

Multiple studies demonstrate that static images featuring specific luminance gradients and contrast patterns can induce compelling visual motion illusions, such as the peripheral drift effect.

Evidence for · 5
1999 · cited by 50
Demonstrates that circularly repeating patches with sawtooth luminance gradients (static images) produce a sensation of motion in the visual periphery.
See more details
The analysis

The claim is a specific, empirically testable scientific proposition about visual perception. The provided literature includes foundational and recent studies (such as Kitaoka's peripheral drift illusion work, investigations into contrast-based visual latency, and research on static illusory expanding holes and the Rotating Snakes illusion) that consistently support the fact that static images can induce motion illusions via peripheral drift and related luminance mechanisms. There are no refuting papers.

More for · 4
2007 · cited by 21
Examines a variant of the anomalous motion illusion in static patterns and finds luminance contrast to be a critical factor.
2025 · cited by 2
Shows that static illusion patterns with asymmetrical luminance gradients evoke motion illusions tied to reflexive changes in pupil diameter.
2024 · cited by 1
Examines both dynamic and static 2D patterns that evoke distinctive perceptions of motion or optic flow.
2024 · cited by 1
Investigates the Rotating Snakes illusion, confirming that stationary images elicit a compelling sense of anomalous motion.
The paper trail · every fact has a biography
first checked04 Aug 2026
judged → SUPPORTED · 8604 Aug 2026
This receipt carries no identity, shared or not. Sharing publishes your connection to it, not your data.
Check your own claim
Challenge the receipt
trust me, bro: win the argument, pass the class, survive peer review.
This receipt is an automated verdict against our published method · not an opinion about any author or publication.
Terms · Privacy · How verdicts work · Dispute this receipt