trustme.bro/r/…
āœ“ checked
trust me, bro:
here is the receipt.
the claim
Stan Taylor discovered human footprints dated from the period of dinosaurs
the verdict
REFUTED
the evidence says no
refutedsupported
the weight of evidence
0 sources for · 3 against

Scientific investigations of the Paluxy River site associated with Stan Taylor have conclusively demonstrated that the purported human footprints are actually dinosaur tracks or altered features, refuting the claim that human prints coexist with dinosaur fossils.

Evidence against · 3
2021 · cited by 32
Explains elongate dinosaur tracks, including those historically misidentified as human prints by creationists in the Paluxy River bed, as deep foot penetrations in soft sediment.
See more details
The analysis

The retrieved scientific literature consistently debunks the claim that Stan Taylor or anyone else discovered human footprints alongside dinosaur fossils in the Paluxy River bed. Papers [1] and [2] directly examine the Taylor site and document that the tracks are dinosaurian (tridactyl) in origin or altered, while paper [0] provides the broader geological and ichnological explanation for why elongate dinosaur tracks can superficially resemble human prints. There are no supporting papers in the retrieved set.

More against · 2
1983 · cited by 8
Demonstrates that the Paluxy River tracks associated with Stan Taylor are not human footprints, but rather large, poorly defined dinosaur tracks and carved artifacts.
1987 · cited by 8
Confirms through detailed measurements and color distinctions at the Taylor site that the alleged human tracks are actually tridactyl dinosaur footprints.
The paper trail · every fact has a biography
first checked04 Aug 2026
judged → REFUTED · 1004 Aug 2026
This receipt carries no identity, shared or not. Sharing publishes your connection to it, not your data.
Check your own claim
Challenge the receipt
trust me, bro: win the argument, pass the class, survive peer review.
This receipt is an automated verdict against our published method · not an opinion about any author or publication.
Terms · Privacy · How verdicts work · Dispute this receipt