trustme.bro/r/…
✓ checked
trust me, bro:
here is the receipt.
the claim
St. Thomas Aquinas' cosmological argument assumes that an infinite regress of contingent things is impossible
the verdict
SUPPORTED
the evidence backs this
refutedsupported
the weight of evidence
3 sources for · 0 against
AS REPORTEDno primary record reached; this is what the reporting says

Scholarly consensus and textual evidence confirm that St. Thomas Aquinas's cosmological argument relies on the rejection of an infinite regress of causes.

Evidence for · 3
Wikipedia: Thomas Aquinas
cited by 0
Reference article covering this claim directly
See more details
How claims like this are judged

Judged against reference works: claims of this kind are settled by the historical reference record, not journal abstracts.

More for · 2
Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy: Thomas Aquinas
cited by 0
Discusses Aquinas's intention to exclude an infinite series of causes.
Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy: Cosmological Argument
cited by 0
Notes that Aquinas's argument assumes an infinite regress of an essentially-ordered series is impossible.
The paper trail · every fact has a biography
first checked04 Aug 2026
judged → SUPPORTED · 7504 Aug 2026
This receipt carries no identity, shared or not. Sharing publishes your connection to it, not your data.
Check your own claim
Challenge the receipt
trust me, bro: win the argument, pass the class, survive peer review.
This receipt is an automated verdict against our published method · not an opinion about any author or publication.
Terms · Privacy · How verdicts work · Dispute this receipt