Spoken languages are more common than signed languages due to evolutionary and modality factors
the verdict
INSUFFICIENT LEANING
refutedsupported
the weight of evidence
2 sources for · 0 against
The retrieved evidence includes discussions on the role of modality and articulatory constraints in signed and spoken languages, but does not provide complete data on the relative prevalence of spoken versus signed languages driven by evolutionary factors.
The realisation that signed languages are true languages is one of the great discoveries of linguistic research. The work of many sign language researchers has revealed deep similarities between signed and spoken languages in their structure, acquisition and processing, as well as differences, arising from the differing articulatory and perceptual constraints under which signed languages are used and learned. This book provides a cross-linguistic examination of the properties of many signed languages, including detailed case studies of Hong Kong, British, Mexican and German sign languages. The contributions to this volume, by some of the most prominent researchers in the field, focus on a single question: to what extent is linguistic structure influenced by the modality of language? Their answers offer particular insights into the factors that shape the nature of language and contribute to our understanding of why languages are organised as they are.
Modality and Structure in Signed and Spoken Languages Search Institution Login Search < Back to search results Home Books Modality and Structure in Signed and Spoken Languages Modality and Structure in Signed and Spoken Languages Modality and Structure in Signed and Spoken Languages Search within full text Cited by 77 Cited by 77 Crossref Citations This Book has been cited by the following publications. This list is generated based on data provided by Crossref . Steinbach, Markus 2004. Review of Schulmeister & Reinitzer (2002): Progress in Sign Language Research. In Honor of Siegmund Prillwitz (Fortschritte in der Gebärdensprachforschung. Festschrift für Siegmund Prillwitz) .
Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2006. Pp. xxi, 547. ISBN 139780521483957. $55. . Language, Vol. 86, Issue. 2, p. 467. CrossRef Google Scholar Quinto-Pozos, David Forber-Pratt, Anjali J. and Singleton, Jenny L. 2011. Do Developmental Communication Disorders Exist in the Signed Modality? Perspectives From Professionals . Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools, Vol. 42, Issue. 4, p. 423. CrossRef Google Scholar de Vos, Connie 2011. Kata Kolok Color Terms and the Emergence of Lexical Signs in Rural Signing Communities . The Senses and Society, Vol. 6, Issue. 1, p. 68. CrossRef Google Scholar ORMEL, ELLEN HERMANS, DAAN KNOORS, HARRY and VERHOEVEN, LUDO 2012.
The work of many sign language researchers has revealed deep similarities between signed and spoken languages in their structure, acquisition and processing, as well as differences, arising from the differing articulatory and perceptual constraints under which signed languages are used and learned. This book provides a cross-linguistic examination of the properties of many signed languages, including detailed case studies of Hong Kong, British, Mexican and German sign languages. The contributions to this volume, by some of the most prominent researchers in the field, focus on a single question: to what extent is linguistic structure influenced by the modality of language?
Their answers offer particular insights into the factors that shape the nature of language and contribute to our understanding of why languages are organised as they are. Reviews ‘For those researchers willing to ask the modality question, this volume will be an excellent resource.’ Source: First Language --> Aa Reduce text Aa Enlarge text Refine List Classifications Actions for selected content: Select all | Deselect all View selected items Save to my bookmarks Export citations Download PDF (zip) Save to Kindle Save to Dropbox Save to Google Drive Save content to To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies.
Meier , Professor of Linguistics and Psychology University of Texas at Austin Get access Check if you have access via personal or institutional login Log in Register Export citation Select Part I - Phonological structure in signed languages Part I - Phonological structure in signed languages pp 27-34 By Richard P.
Representations of repetition in spoken and signed languages 3 - Beads on a string? Representations of repetition in spoken and signed languages pp 65-87 By Rachel Channon , Doctorate in linguistics University of Maryland at College Park Get access Check if you have access via personal or institutional login Log in Register Export citation Select 4 - Psycholinguistic investigations of phonological structure in ASL 4 - Psycholinguistic investigations of phonological structure in ASL pp 88-111 By David P. Corina , Associate Professor of Psychology University of Washington in Seattle, WA, Ursula C.
Meier , Professor of Linguistics and Psychology University of Texas at Austin, Kearsy Cormier , Doctorate in linguistics University of Texas at Austin, David Quinto-Pozos , Teacher Department of Linguistics at the University of Pittsburgh Get access Check if you have access via
12 - Nominal expressions in Hong Kong Sign Language: Does modality make a difference? pp 296-320 By Gladys Tang , Associate Professor Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, Felix Y. B. Sze , Research student University of Bristol, UK Get access Check if you have access via personal or institutional login Log in Register Export citation Select Part IV - Using space and describing space: Pronouns, classifiers, and verb agreement Part IV - Using space and describing space: Pronouns, classifiers, and verb agreement pp 321-328 By Richard P.
Meier , Professor of Linguistics and Psychology University of Texas at Austin, Kearsy Cormier , Doctorate in linguistics University of Texas at Austin, David Quinto-Pozos , Teacher Department of Linguistics at the University of Pittsburgh Get access Check if you have access via personal or institutional login Log in Register Export citation Select 13 - Pronominal reference in signed and spoken language: Are grammatical categories modality-dependent? 13 - Pronominal reference in signed and spoken language: Are grammatical categories modality-dependent?
The ten things you should know about sign languages are the following. 1) Sign languages have phonology and poetry. 2) Sign languages vary in their linguistic structure and family history, but share some typological features due to their shared biology (manual production). 3) Although there are many similarities between perceiving and producing speech and sign, the biology of language can impact aspects of processing. 4) Iconicity is pervasive in sign language lexicons and can play a role in language acquisition and processing. 5) Deaf and hard-of-hearing children are at risk for language deprivation. 6) Signers gesture when signing. 7) Sign language experience enhances some visual-spatial skills. 8) The same left hemisphere brain regions support both spoken and sign languages, but some neural regions are specific to sign language. 9) Bimodal bilinguals can code-blend, rather code-switch, which alters the nature of language control. 10) The emergence of new sign languages reveals patterns of language creation and evolution. These discoveries reveal how language modality does and does not affect language structure, acquisition, processing, use, and representation in the brain. Sign languages provide unique insights into human language that cannot be obtained by studying spoken languages alone.
Everything we examined (2)
This check searched the claim as stated. It did not run a separate search for evidence against it.