(1) In chloralose anaesthetized cats, reflex responses were recorded in inferior cardiac nerves following stimulation of intercostal nerves and hind limb afferent nerves. (2) In 80% of cats, a long latency reflex response alone was recorded, whereas, in the others, a short and long latency response was present to intercostal nerve stimulation. (3) In cats displaying only a long latency somatocardiac reflex response, damage to the ventral quadrant of the ipsilateral cervical spinal cord, through which runs a bulbospinal inhibitory pathway, resulted in the appearance of shorter latency reflexes to intercostal nerve stimulation. Lesions elsewhere in the cervical cord did not do this. (4) The characteristics of the early responses indicated that they were somatosympathetic reflexes and not dorsal root reflexes. (5) The early reflexes remained and the late reflex disappeared on subsequent complete transection of the spinal cord. The early reflexes were therefore spinal reflexes, and suppressed in the animal with cord intact. (6) Lesions at C4, which included a contralateral hemisection and a section of dorsal columns extending into the dorsal part of the lateral funiculus, abolished the inhibition of a sympathetic reflex that followed stimulation of some somatic afferent nerve fibres. These sections did not release the spinal reflex. Therefore, this reflex inhibition was not responsible for the suppression of the spinal somatosympathetic reflex. (7) The descending inhibitory influ