Specific features of conditioned and unconditioned stimuli are represented in the lateral amygdala

the verdict

SUPPORTED

the evidence backs this

Recorded sources

2 sources for · 0 against

Counts group repeated records of the same source within each side. They do not measure evidence strength or source independence.

Neuroscientific evidence indicates that specific features of both conditioned and unconditioned stimuli are represented by neural populations within the lateral amygdala.

The analysis

The claim specifically asserts that conditioned and unconditioned stimulus features are represented in the lateral amygdala. Paper [1] directly supports this by showing how lateral amygdala neurons exhibit differential plasticity and sensory responses to conditioned and unconditioned stimulus relationships. Paper [0] provides broader foundational support for the amygdala's role in processing these stimuli. No papers refute the claim.

Evidence for · 2

The role of the amygdala in conditioned and unconditioned fear and anxiety

Recorded source metadata

Michael Davis. The role of the amygdala in conditioned and unconditioned fear and anxiety. 2000. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198505013.003.0006

This paper reviews evidence that the amygdala is crucially involved in conditioned and unconditioned fear, serving as a primary site for processing relevant stimulus properties.

Source citation format

See more details

More for · 1

Differential Fear Conditioning Induces Reciprocal Changes in the Sensory Responses of Lateral Amygdala Neurons to the CS+ and CS−

Recorded source metadata

Dawn R. Collins, Denis Paré. Differential Fear Conditioning Induces Reciprocal Changes in the Sensory Responses of Lateral Amygdala Neurons to the CS+ and CS−. 2000. https://doi.org/10.1101/lm.7.2.97

This study demonstrates that lateral amygdala neurons undergo differential changes in sensory responses to conditioned and unconditioned stimulus pathways, confirming representational specificity.

Source citation format

The paper trail · every fact has a biography

first checked01 Aug 2026

judged → SUPPORTED · 9001 Aug 2026

More receipts

Is it true that Phonological evolution involves regular processes of phoneme elision, vowel nasalization, and tonogenesis?Is it true that Hemangiomas are treatable with medication?Is it true that Research identifies forms of intelligence that diverge from standard IQ measures?

Random receipt →The Trust Wiki →

Anyone with this link can read the claim and its public receipt, including any personal information in that text. Open permanent receipt.

Check your own claim

Challenge the receipt

I have a source that contradicts this verdict I have a source that supports it No source: request a receipt review Requests are recorded for review. This does not start an automatic check or guarantee a response time.

trust me, bro: win the argument, pass the class, survive peer review.

Citation formatting by citeproc-js (Frank Bennett) and the Citation Style Language project. Source and licenses.

This receipt is an automated verdict against our published method · not an opinion about any author or publication.
Terms · Privacy · How verdicts work · Dispute this receipt