trustme.bro/r/…
✓ checked
trust me, bro:
here is the receipt.
the claim
Something being causal requires that it be the sole cause.
the verdict
REFUTED
the evidence says no
refutedsupported
the weight of evidence
0 sources for · 3 against

Standard definitions and philosophical treatments of causation explicitly recognize that effects can have multiple contributory causes, meaning a causal factor does not need to be the sole cause.

Evidence against · 3
1979 · cited by 14
Contributory cause is a clinically useful concept of causation. It requires demonstration that (1) the presumed cause precedes the effect and (2) altering the cause alters the effect. It does not require that all those who possess the contributory cause experience the effect. It does not require that all those who are free of the contributory cause be free of the effect. In other words, a clinical cause may be neither necessary or sufficient but it must be contributory.
See more details
The analysis

rails:sufficiency:refuted:for=0+0p:against=3+0p | v55:sufficiency

More against · 2
2010 · cited by 0
... Something more is required even when the correlation is a stronger, universal one, where events of type Y always ... sole cause' of some event, the existence of many such necessary conditions does not rule out some other event x ... The concept of causation is fundamental to ascribing moral and legal responsibility for events. Yet the relationship between causation and responsibility remains unclear. What precisely is the connection between the concept of causation used in attributing responsibility and the accounts of causal relations offered in the philosophy of science and metaphysics? How much of what we call causal responsibility is in truth defined by non-causal factors? This book argues that much of thelegal doctrine on these questions is confused and incoherent, and offers the first comprehensive attempt since Hart and Honoré to clarify the philosophical background to the legal and moral debates.The book first sets out the place of causation in criminal and tort law and outlines the metaphysics presupposed by
cited by 0
have multiple causes, which are also said to be causal factors for it, and all lie in its past. An effect can in turn be a cause of, or causal factor for Causality is an influence by which one event, process, state, or subject (i.e., a cause) contributes to the production of another event, process, state, or object (i.e., an effect) where the cause is at least partly responsible for the effect, and the effect is at least partly dependent on the cause. The cause of something may also be described as the reason behind the event or process. In general Causality is an influence by which one event, process, state, or subject (i.e., a cause) contributes to the production of another event, process, state, or object (i.e., an… An…
Everything we examined (3)
This check searched the claim as stated. It did not run a separate search for evidence against it.
  1. Causation and Responsibilityreferenceno side taken
  2. Causalityreferenceno side taken
  3. Contributory cause: unnecessary and insufficient.peer-reviewedno side taken
This receipt carries no identity, shared or not. Sharing publishes your connection to it, not your data.
Check your own claim
Challenge the receipt
trust me, bro: win the argument, pass the class, survive peer review.
This receipt is an automated verdict against our published method · not an opinion about any author or publication.
Terms · Privacy · How verdicts work · Dispute this receipt