trustme.bro/r/…
✓ checked
trust me, bro:
here is the receipt.
the claim
Somatosensory prediction attenuation prevents humans from tickling themselves
the verdict
SUPPORTED
the evidence backs this
confidence 95/100

Extensive psychological and neuroimaging evidence demonstrates that internal forward models in the brain generate predictive signals about self-produced movements, which attenuate somatosensory feedback and prevent humans from successfully tickling themselves.

Evidence for · 5
The emulation theory of representation: Motor control, imagery, and perception
2004 · cited by 1,386
Discusses how internal models use efference copies during motor control to provide expectations and reduce sensory feedback effects.
See more details
More for · 4
Why canʼt you tickle yourself?
2000 · cited by 921
Proposes that attenuation of self-produced tactile stimulation (such as tickling) is driven by sensory predictions from internal forward models.
Motor imagery involves predicting the sensory consequences of the imagined movement
2018 · cited by 306
Demonstrates that imagined self-touch also produces sensory attenuation, supporting the role of forward models in predicting sensory consequences.
Attenuation of Self-Generated Tactile Sensations Is Predictive, not Postdictive
2006 · cited by 244
Provides evidence that sensory attenuation of self-generated touch relies on a predictive process rather than postdictive judgment.
Functional Connectivity between the Cerebellum and Somatosensory Areas Implements the Attenuation of Self-Generated Touch
2019 · cited by 120
Shows that corticocerebellar functional connectivity implements the predictive attenuation of self-generated touch, explaining why it feels less ticklish.
The paper trail · every fact has a biography
first checked31 Jul 2026
judged → SUPPORTED · 9531 Jul 2026
This receipt carries no identity, shared or not. Sharing publishes your connection to it, not your data.
Check your own claim
Challenge the receipt
trust me, bro: win the argument, pass the class, survive peer review.
This receipt is an automated verdict against our published method · not an opinion about any author or publication.
Terms · Privacy · How verdicts work · Dispute this receipt