trustme.bro/r/…
✓ checked
trust me, bro:
here is the receipt.
the claim
Somatosensory prediction attenuation prevents humans from tickling themselves
the verdict
SUPPORTED
the evidence backs this
refutedsupported
the weight of evidence
5 sources for · 0 against

Extensive psychological and neuroimaging evidence demonstrates that internal forward models in the brain generate predictive signals about self-produced movements, which attenuate somatosensory feedback and prevent humans from successfully tickling themselves.

Evidence for · 5
2004 · cited by 1,386
Discusses how internal models use efference copies during motor control to provide expectations and reduce sensory feedback effects.
See more details
The analysis

The claim is a specific and empirically testable proposition about motor control and somatosensory perception. Multiple highly cited papers and fMRI studies consistently support the forward-model/efference-copy theory of sensory attenuation as the underlying mechanism preventing self-tickling, with no papers refuting this core phenomenon.

More for · 4
2000 · cited by 921
Proposes that attenuation of self-produced tactile stimulation (such as tickling) is driven by sensory predictions from internal forward models.
2018 · cited by 306
Demonstrates that imagined self-touch also produces sensory attenuation, supporting the role of forward models in predicting sensory consequences.
2006 · cited by 244
Provides evidence that sensory attenuation of self-generated touch relies on a predictive process rather than postdictive judgment.
2019 · cited by 120
Shows that corticocerebellar functional connectivity implements the predictive attenuation of self-generated touch, explaining why it feels less ticklish.
The paper trail · every fact has a biography
first checked31 Jul 2026
judged → SUPPORTED · 9531 Jul 2026
This receipt carries no identity, shared or not. Sharing publishes your connection to it, not your data.
Check your own claim
Challenge the receipt
trust me, bro: win the argument, pass the class, survive peer review.
This receipt is an automated verdict against our published method · not an opinion about any author or publication.
Terms · Privacy · How verdicts work · Dispute this receipt