trustme.bro/r/…
✓ checked
trust me, bro:
here is the receipt.
the claim
Snopes operates as a politically partisan organization that suppresses information favorable to the Obama administration.
the verdict
REFUTED
the evidence says no
refutedsupported
the weight of evidence
0 sources for · 2 against
AS REPORTEDno primary record reached; this is what the reporting says

Fact-checking reports evaluate and reject allegations that Snopes operates as a politically partisan organization with an agenda to protect specific administrations or discredit figures.

Evidence against · 2
cited by 0
Snopes.com - FactCheck.org FactCheck.org® A Project of The Annenberg Public Policy Center --- Q: Is Snopes.com run by “very Democratic” proprietors? Did they lie to discredit a State Farm insurance agent who attacked Obama? A: A chain e-mail that “exposed” Snopes contains falsehoods. And in fact, the site is run by someone who has no political party affiliation and his non-voting Canadian wife. A State Farm spokeswoman confirms what they reported about the Obama-baiting agent. FULL QUESTION Can you verify? Chain e-mail: “Snopes” Exposed Posted on February 26, 2009 at 2:29am For the past few years snopes.com has positioned itself, or others have labeled it, as the ‘tell-all final word’ on any comment, claim and email. But for several years people tried to find out who exactly was behind snopes.com. Only recently did Wikipedia get to the bottom of it – kinda makes you wonder what they were hiding. Well, finally we know. It is run by a husband and wife team – that’s right, no big office of investigators and researchers, no team of lawyers. It’s just a mom-and-pop operation that began as a hobby. David and Barbara Mikkelson in the San Fernando Valley of California started
See more details
The analysis

rails:sufficiency:refuted:for=0+0p:against=2+0p | v55:sufficiency

More against · 1
cited by 0
No, Snopes Wasn't 'BUSTED' for CEO's Supposed Ties to George Soros | Snopes.com Snopes Now available in the app store! Open Log in to activate your ad-free access. It looks like you might have a Snopes membership! Log in to enjoy your ad-free experience. Log In From Snopes You're browsing with fewer ads for the next 24 hours, thanks to our sponsor https://l.join1440.com/?utm_source=snopes&utm_medium=website. Learn more → Fact Check # No, Snopes Wasn't 'BUSTED' for CEO's Supposed Ties to George Soros ## A meme about Snopes.com has been debunked by the very source it cites. ### Brooke Binkowski ### Published Feb. 17, 2018 Updated Feb. 18, 2018 Claim: Snopes.com is an extremely liberal site with an agenda to discredit conservatives, paid for either by George Soros or the Clintons, or maybe Facebook. Rating: False About this rating In February 2018, a years-old rumor about us spawned yet another low-effort, extremely inconsistent meme: We are unable to tell whether this meme was created initially as a joke or whether it was belched out from the bowels of a propaganda site, but it is hitting our sitemail with enough regularity that we decided to address it. The image sh
Everything we examined (2)
This check searched the claim as stated. It did not run a separate search for evidence against it.
  1. Snopes.comfact-checkerno side taken
  2. No, Snopes Wasn't 'BUSTED' for CEO's Supposed Ties to George Soros | Snopes.comfact-checkerno side taken
The paper trail · every fact has a biography
first checked05 Aug 2026
judged → INSUFFICIENT EVIDENCE · 005 Aug 2026
held for human review08 Aug 2026
This receipt carries no identity, shared or not. Sharing publishes your connection to it, not your data.
Check your own claim
Challenge the receipt
trust me, bro: win the argument, pass the class, survive peer review.
This receipt is an automated verdict against our published method · not an opinion about any author or publication.
Terms · Privacy · How verdicts work · Dispute this receipt