Smaller organisms exhibit faster muscular contraction kinetics and movement speeds relative to body size than larger organisms
the verdict
CONTESTED PARTIAL
refutedsupported
the weight of evidence
2 sources for · 1 against
Selected physiological studies partially support the premise that smaller organisms exhibit higher relative metabolic power or performance traits such as jumping force, while others indicate complex or hump-shaped relationships between body mass and movement speed due to biophysical constraints.
Efficiency of vertebrate locomotory muscles. We have examined the efficiency of vertebrate striated muscle at two different organizational levels: whole animals and isolated muscles. Terrestrial locomotion is used as a model of 'normal' muscular contraction; animal size and running speed are used as independent variables in order to change either the metabolic requirements of the muscles or the mechanical power production by the muscles over a wide range of values. The weight-specific metabolic power input to an animal increases nearly linearly with speed and increases with decreasing body size, while the weight-specific mechanical power output increases curvilinearly with speed and is independent of size. Consequently, the efficiency of the muscles in producing positive work increases with speed and the peak efficiency increases with increasing body size, attaining values of over 70% in large animals, but only 7% in small ones. The isolated muscle experiments were performed on frog muscle, and rat 'fast' and 'slow' muscles.
Abstract
Dispersal is critical to animal survival and thus biodiversity in fragmented landscapes. Increasing fragmentation in the Anthropocene necessitates predictions about the dispersal capabilities of the many species that inhabit natural ecosystems. This requires mechanistic, trait-based models of animal dispersal which are sufficiently general as well as biologically realistic. While larger animals should generally be able to travel greater distances, reported trends in their speeds across a range of body sizes suggest limited locomotor capacities among the largest species. Here, we show that this also applies to dispersal speeds and that this arises because of their limited heat-dissipation capacities. We derive a model considering how fundamental biophysical constraints of animal body mass associated with energy utilisation (i.e. larger animals have a lower metabolic energy cost of locomotion) and heat-dissipation (i.e. larger animals require more time to dissipate metabolic heat) limit sustained (i.e. aerobic) dispersal speeds. Using an extensive empirical dataset of animal dispersal speeds (531 species), we show that this
allometric heat-dissipation model
best captures the hump-shaped trends in dispersal speed with body mass for flying, running and swimming animals. This implies that the inability to dissipate metabolic heat leads to the saturation and eventual decrease in dispersal speed with increasing body mass as larger animals must reduce their realised dispersal speeds in order to avoid hyperthermia during extended dispersal bouts. As a result, the highest dispersal speeds are achieved by animals of intermediate body mass, whereas the largest species might suffer from stronger dispersal limitations in fragmented landscapes than previously anticipated. Consequently, we provide a mechanistic understanding of animal dispersal speed that can be generalised across species, even when the details of an individual species’ biology are unknown, to facilitate more realistic predictions of biodiversity dynamics in fragmented landscapes.
The two simian species, Macaca fuscata and Homo sapiens, are usually terrestrial and have good jumping capacities, although not in terms of quantity. The investigation is based on high-speed motion analyses (100-500 frames/second) and the synchronized records of a force-plate from which all subjects had to jump off. On the basis of the results two kinds of jumping can be distinguished: standing and running jumps. The three prosimian species perform standing jumps. Dorsiflexion of their tails compensates ventrally oriented rotational moments of the trunk during body extension at take-off. The upward arm swing yields an overall increase in take-off velocity without additional muscular force exerted by the legs. The main difference among the species are the high relative forces in the small Galago moholi (up to 13 times body weight) as compared to the larger G. garnettii (8.5 times body weight) and the even larger Lemur catta (4.5 times body weight). In Homo sapiens the standing jump is characterized by an extensive arm swing backward, which is then followed by a forward and upward movement. The velocity at take-off is much smaller if compared to the prosimians.
Everything we examined (3)
This check searched the claim as stated. It did not run a separate search for evidence against it.