trustme.bro/r/…
✓ checked
trust me, bro:
here is the receipt.
the claim
Small-scale mass drivers are physically feasible using current electromagnetic coil technology.
the verdict
INSUFFICIENT LEANING
refutedsupported
the weight of evidence
2 sources for · 0 against

Peer-reviewed literature discusses small-scale models utilizing active mass driver systems and proposed electromagnetic launcher concepts, but the retrieved evidence provides only partial coverage regarding the generalized physical feasibility of small-scale mass drivers using current electromagnetic coil technology.

Evidence for · 2
2014 · cited by 52
Small‐scale models have been commonly utilized in testing of performance of active mass driver (AMD) control systems. The utmost reason is that physical testing of AMD system at full scale is usually too expensive to afford, as well as hard to implement on site. With reference to the real‐time hybrid simulation technology, a real‐time AMD subsystem testing method is proposed in this paper. In this method, the entire system is composed of AMD as physical subsystem and target structure as numerical subsystem. The physical test is conducted on AMD subsystem, whereas the numerical simulation is carried out on the structure subsystem. Meanwhile, the real‐time data are being communicated between these two subsystems. This method is then applied to the performance validation of a novel AMD control system, which is driven by a linear motor. In the test, a benchmark three‐storey frame structure is employed as the numerical subsystem, and earthquake excitations are used as the external input. On the basis of a series of tests, both the time history and the statistical criteria show that the results of AMD subsystem and structure subsystem obtained in the real‐time AMD subsystem test agree well with the simulation results. Furthermore, all the test results show good repeatability. Therefore, the feasibility and reliability of the proposed real‐time AMD subsystem testing approach for performance validation of AMD subsystem has been demonstrated. Such kind of experimental method is efficient in terms of reducing cost associated with performance validation of large‐scale active control systems prior to the implementation. Copyright © 2013 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
See more details
The analysis

rails:sufficiency:partial_only:for=0+2p:against=0+0p | v55:multi_partial_one_side:lean=lean_partial:for:one_sided

More for · 1
2026 · cited by 0
Asteroid mining represents a multi-trillion-dollar economic opportunity, with single asteroids containing platinum-group metals valued at $10-100 trillion. However, current economic analyses assume rocket-based return of materials, yielding costs of $10,000-50,000 per kilogram that render most operations unprofitable. This paper presents electromagnetic mass driver systems deployed directly on asteroid surfaces as the enabling technology for economically viable resource extraction. We analyze the physics, engineering, and economics of asteroid-based launch systems, demonstrating that: (1) negligible asteroid gravity (0.0001-0.01g) enables compact mass drivers (50-500m) with minimal structural requirements; (2) launch costs drop to $1-50/kg, representing a 1000× improvement over rocket-based return; (3) target asteroids including 16 Psyche, Bennu, and Ryugu contain sufficient valuable materials to justify $5-50B infrastructure investments with 5-15 year payback periods; (4) electromagnetic launch enables closed-loop mining operations where equipment, propellant, and refined materials circulate between asteroids, Earth orbit, and lunar facilities. We present mission architectures for near-Earth asteroid (NEA) demonstration missions (2030-2035, $2-5B), main belt operations (2035-2050, $20-100B), and full industrialization (2050+, $200B+ cumulative). Legal analysis addresses property rights under the Outer Space Treaty and Artemis Accords. This work establishes the technical and economic framework for humanity's first trillion-dollar space industry.
The paper trail · every fact has a biography
held for human review08 Aug 2026
This receipt carries no identity, shared or not. Sharing publishes your connection to it, not your data.
Check your own claim
Challenge the receipt
trust me, bro: win the argument, pass the class, survive peer review.
This receipt is an automated verdict against our published method · not an opinion about any author or publication.
Terms · Privacy · How verdicts work · Dispute this receipt