trustme.bro/r/…
✓ checked
trust me, bro:
here is the receipt.
the claim
Simultaneous cyclones have occurred in the same ocean in different hemispheres
the verdict
SUPPORTED
the evidence backs this
refutedsupported
the weight of evidence
1 source for · 0 against

A peer-reviewed study documents that multiple storms and depressions have formed simultaneously on both sides of the equator in the Indian Ocean area.

Evidence for · 1
1977 · cited by 0
Malurkar (1950) postulated the formation of depressions or cyclones on both Sides of equator within a narrow ( <=40°) longitudinal belt, Pisharoty and Kulkarni (1956) conducted some case studies and Came to the conclusion that they do form as postulated by Malurkar and there is mutual interaction with one another so much so that when one system Intensifies the other weakens, Kuettner (1967) opined that the existence and, alignment of hills in Sumatra are responsible for simultaneous occurrences of storms and depressions on both sides of equator, To verify the above conclusions the present study was undertaken, It covers an 11 year period from 1964 to 1974. During the period as many as 14 storms/depressions formed on both sides of equator. Of course, there were some years when such systems did not develop, They form in transition months with a bias towards the post monsoon season, Kuettner's conclusions are generally supported. Pisharoty and Kulkarni's conclusions could not be supported, by the present study, Malurkar's conclusion that two tropical storms cannot both continue to move westwards and co-exist on either side of the equator when the longitudinal separation is small (<=10°) is also supported.
See more details
The analysis

rails:sufficiency:supported:single_source:for=1+0p:against=0+0p | v55:sufficiency

Everything we examined (1)
This check searched the claim as stated. It did not run a separate search for evidence against it.
  1. Simultaneous occurrence of tropical cyclones on either side of the equator in the Indian Ocean areapeer-reviewedno side taken
This receipt carries no identity, shared or not. Sharing publishes your connection to it, not your data.
Check your own claim
Challenge the receipt
trust me, bro: win the argument, pass the class, survive peer review.
This receipt is an automated verdict against our published method · not an opinion about any author or publication.
Terms · Privacy · How verdicts work · Dispute this receipt