trustme.bro/r/…
✓ checked
trust me, bro:
here is the receipt.
the claim
Significant advances have been made in liver transplants over the past 30 years
the verdict
SUPPORTED
the evidence backs this
confidence 79/100

Significant advances have been made in liver transplantation over the past 30 years, driven by refined oncologic indications, improved patient matching, and the integration of artificial intelligence.

Evidence for · 4
Interactions Between Donor and Recipient age in Liver Transplantation: Implications for Donor and Recipient Matching.
2026 · cited by 3
Recent literature demonstrates refined understanding of donor-recipient matching and survival trends over the past decade in liver transplantation.
See more details
More for · 3
Are King's College and Clichy-Villejuif criteria used for liver transplantation still appropriate? A retrospective study over a 25-year period.
2026 · cited by 0
Retrospective data over a 25-year period highlights the evolution and ongoing critical evaluation of emergency criteria for liver transplantation.
Redefining Liver Transplantation Indications for Hepatic Malignancies in the Era of Precision Transplant Oncology: An Up-to-Date Narrative Review.
2026 · cited by 0
Advancements in precision transplant oncology have expanded liver transplantation indications for hepatic malignancies over recent decades.
Early Implications for Solid Organ Transplantation With the Use of Artificial Intelligence From a Bibliometric Perspective.
2026 · cited by 0
Bibliometric analysis tracking artificial intelligence applications in organ transplantation over decades demonstrates substantial technological integration into liver and other solid organ transplants.
The paper trail · every fact has a biography
first checked02 Aug 2026
judged → SUPPORTED · 7902 Aug 2026
This receipt carries no identity, shared or not. Sharing publishes your connection to it, not your data.
Check your own claim
Challenge the receipt
trust me, bro: win the argument, pass the class, survive peer review.
This receipt is an automated verdict against our published method · not an opinion about any author or publication.
Terms · Privacy · How verdicts work · Dispute this receipt