trustme.bro/r/…
✓ checked
trust me, bro:
here is the receipt.
the claim
Shooting someone in the forehead from point blank range can fail to kill him
the verdict
SUPPORTED
the evidence backs this
refutedsupported
the weight of evidence
3 sources for · 0 against

Clinical literature confirms that individuals can survive gunshot wounds to the head due to factors such as low bullet velocity, trajectory bypassing critical midline structures, and prompt surgical intervention.

Evidence for · 3
2012 · cited by 25
Demonstrates that patients with civilian gunshot wounds to the head can survive and achieve good outcomes after emergent neurosurgical intervention.
See more details
The analysis

The claim states that shooting someone in the forehead from point blank range can fail to kill them. This is an empirical statement about survival after close-range cranial trauma. Multiple medical papers detail cases where patients survived penetrating head injuries or gunshot wounds to the head, often depending on trajectory and velocity. Therefore, the evidence supports the claim.

More for · 2
2023 · cited by 3
Notes that patients with penetrating head injuries who do not experience major vessel injury or midline involvement can survive without fatal consequences.
2022 · cited by 2
Documents that low-muzzle velocity head injuries frequently result in nonfatal outcomes even with surgical intervention.
The paper trail · every fact has a biography
first checked04 Aug 2026
judged → SUPPORTED · 8404 Aug 2026
This receipt carries no identity, shared or not. Sharing publishes your connection to it, not your data.
Check your own claim
Challenge the receipt
trust me, bro: win the argument, pass the class, survive peer review.
This receipt is an automated verdict against our published method · not an opinion about any author or publication.
Terms · Privacy · How verdicts work · Dispute this receipt