Trust Me Bro: the receipt

trustme.bro/r/…

✓ checked

trust me, bro:

here is the receipt.

the claim

Sexual preference development is influenced by biological and environmental factors

the verdict

SUPPORTED

the evidence backs this

refutedsupported

the weight of evidence

3 sources for · 0 against

Current scientific literature consistently supports the view that human sexual preference development is shaped by an interplay of biological, genetic, neurological, and environmental factors.

Evidence for · 3

biological and psychosocial determinants of male and female human sexual orientation

2004 · cited by 12

Paper [0] suggests that sexual orientation is influenced by a combination of prenatal steroids, genetic predispositions, and postnatal learning processes.

citation format

See more details

The analysis

Papers [0], [1], and [2] all provide direct empirical and review evidence that sexual orientation is influenced by a mix of biological/genetic variables and environmental/learning factors. No retrieved papers refute this claim.

More for · 2

Accurate machine learning prediction of sexual orientation based on brain morphology and intrinsic functional connectivity.

2023 · cited by 4

Paper [1] indicates that sexual orientation is grounded in both neurobiological and environmental factors, using brain morphology and functional connectivity for prediction.

Biological, genetic, neurological and environmental influences on homosexuality-a narrative review.

2025 · cited by 2

Paper [2] reviews evidence showing that homosexuality is an intricate, multifactorial phenomenon shaped by biological, genetic, neurological, and environmental factors.

The paper trail · every fact has a biography

first checked04 Aug 2026

judged → SUPPORTED · 8204 Aug 2026

More receipts

Is it true that Phonological evolution involves regular processes of phoneme elision, vowel nasalization, and tonogenesis?Is it true that Hemangiomas are treatable with medication?Is it true that Research identifies forms of intelligence that diverge from standard IQ measures?

Random receipt →The Trust Wiki →

This receipt carries no identity, shared or not. Sharing publishes your connection to it, not your data.

Check your own claim

Challenge the receipt

I have a source that contradicts this verdict I have a source that supports it No source: the research is thin, dig deeper

trust me, bro: win the argument, pass the class, survive peer review.

This receipt is an automated verdict against our published method · not an opinion about any author or publication.
Terms · Privacy · How verdicts work · Dispute this receipt