trustme.bro/r/…
✓ checked
trust me, bro:
here is the receipt.
the claim
Seventy-nine percent of pregnancies in an early COVID-19 vaccine study resulted in loss
the verdict
REFUTED
the evidence says no
refutedsupported
the weight of evidence
0 sources for · 3 against

Extensive clinical data and large-scale registry studies have consistently shown that COVID-19 vaccination in early pregnancy does not increase the risk of miscarriage or pregnancy loss.

Evidence against · 3
2023 · cited by 11
This international registry study of early pregnancy found an estimated cumulative risk of spontaneous abortion of 13.4%, which aligns with expected baseline population rates and shows no evidence of elevated loss following mRNA vaccination.
See more details
The analysis

The claim that seventy-nine percent of pregnancies in an early vaccine study resulted in loss is entirely false and contradicts multiple large-scale epidemiological studies, registries, and meta-analyses showing normal baseline miscarriage rates (around 10-15%) among vaccinated individuals.

More against · 2
2025 · cited by 3
This case-control study found no association between COVID-19 vaccination in early pregnancy and spontaneous abortion.
2025 · cited by 0
This extensive meta-analysis synthesizing evidence from numerous studies demonstrates that COVID-19 vaccination during pregnancy safely reduces adverse neonatal and maternal outcomes rather than causing pregnancy loss.
The paper trail · every fact has a biography
first checked02 Aug 2026
judged → REFUTED · 702 Aug 2026
recheck_disputes_verdict11 Aug 2026
held for human review11 Aug 2026
This receipt carries no identity, shared or not. Sharing publishes your connection to it, not your data.
Check your own claim
Challenge the receipt
trust me, bro: win the argument, pass the class, survive peer review.
This receipt is an automated verdict against our published method · not an opinion about any author or publication.
Terms · Privacy · How verdicts work · Dispute this receipt