trustme.bro/r/…
✓ checked
trust me, bro:
here is the receipt.
the claim
RTM amplitudes should be quantitatively related to rock physics properties
the verdict
SUPPORTED
the evidence backs this
refutedsupported
the weight of evidence
1 source for · 0 against

A peer-reviewed study demonstrates that reverse time migration imaging conditions must account for geometrical spreading and scattering attenuations to accurately represent the physical reflection coefficients of scanned media.

Evidence for · 1
2019 · cited by 0
Cross-correlation imaging condition of reverse time migration generates high-amplitude artifacts in the reconstructed images. In addition, due to geometrical spreading and scattering attenuations, this imaging condition assigns amplitudes to the points of the reconstructed image that are not a true representative of the reflection coefficient of the scanned medium at those points. These all can lead to a reduction in quality and misinterpretation of the reconstructed images. In this paper, we proposed new imaging conditions to mitigate high-amplitude artifacts and to assign more accurate amplitudes to an RTM image by considering geometrical spreading and scattering attenuation in concrete members when horizontal shear waves are used for imaging. We used data obtained by transmitting horizontal shear waves to 3D synthetic homogeneous and concrete specimens and demonstrated the effectiveness of the new imaging conditions.
See more details
The analysis

rails:sufficiency:supported:single_source:for=1+0p:against=0+0p | v55:sufficiency

Everything we examined (1)
This check searched the claim as stated. It did not run a separate search for evidence against it.
  1. Analytical reverse time migration with new imaging conditions for one-sided nondestructive evaluation of concrete elements using shear waves.peer-reviewedno side taken
This receipt carries no identity, shared or not. Sharing publishes your connection to it, not your data.
Check your own claim
Challenge the receipt
trust me, bro: win the argument, pass the class, survive peer review.
This receipt is an automated verdict against our published method · not an opinion about any author or publication.
Terms · Privacy · How verdicts work · Dispute this receipt