Routine annual physical examinations provide measurable health value
the verdict
CONTESTED
contested - evenly split
refutedsupported
the weight of evidence
3 sources for · 1 against
The literature on routine annual physical examinations is mixed, with some evidence showing benefits in preventive services and other reviews indicating they do not reduce overall mortality or morbidity.
<h4>Background</h4>The periodic health evaluation (PHE) has been a fundamental part of medical practice for decades despite a lack of consensus on its value.<h4>Purpose</h4>To synthesize the evidence on benefits and harms of the PHE.<h4>Data sources</h4>Electronic searches of such databases as MEDLINE and the Cochrane Library, review of reference lists, and hand- searching of journals through September 2006.<h4>Study selection</h4>Studies (English-language only) assessing the delivery of preventive services, clinical outcomes, and costs among patients receiving the PHE versus those receiving usual care.<h4>Data extraction</h4>Study design and settings, descriptions of the PHE, and clinical outcomes associated with the PHE.<h4>Data synthesis</h4>The best available evidence assessing benefits or harms of the PHE consisted of 21 studies published from 1973 to 2004. The PHE had a consistently beneficial association with patient receipt of gynecologic examinations and Papanicolaou smears, cholesterol screening, and fecal occult blood testing. The PHE also had a beneficial effect on patient "worry" in 1 randomized, controlled trial but had mixed effects on other clinical outcomes and costs.<h4>Limitations</h4>Descriptions of the PHE and outcomes were heterogeneous. Some trials were performed before U.S. Preventive Services Task Force guidelines were disseminated, limiting their applicability to modern practice.<h4>Conclusions</h4>Evidence suggests that the PHE improves delivery of some recommended preventive services and may lessen patient worry. Although additional research is needed to clarify the long-term benefits, harms, and costs of receiving the PHE, evidence of benefits in this study justifies implementation of the PHE in clinical practice.
routine physical, also known as general medical examination, periodic health evaluation, annual physical, comprehensive medical exam, general health check
In a physical examination, medical examination, clinical examination, or medical checkup, a medical practitioner examines a patient for any possible medical signs or symptoms of a medical condition. It generally consists of a series of questions about the patient's medical history followed by an examination based on the reported symptoms. Together, the medical history and the physical examination
The lack of good evidence contrasts with population surveys showing that the general public is fond of these examinations, especially when they are free of charge. Despite guidelines recommending against routine annual examinations, many family physicians perform them. A fee-for-service healthcare system has been suggested to promote this practice. An alternative would be to tailor…
General health checks, including physical examinations performed when the patient reported no health concerns, often include medical screening for common conditions, such as high blood pressure. A Cochrane review found that general health checks did not reduce the risk of death from cancer, heart disease, or any other cause, and could not be proved to affect the patient's likelihood of being admitted to the hospital, becoming disabled, missing work, or needing additional office visits. The study found no effect on the risk of illness, but did find evidence suggesting that patients subject to routine physicals were diagnosed with hypertension and other chronic conditions at a higher rate than those who were not. Its authors noted that studies often failed to consider or report possible harmful outcomes (such as unwarranted anxiety or unnecessary follow-up procedures), and concluded that routine health checks were "unlikely to be beneficial" in regards to lowering cardiovascular and cancer morbidity and mortality.
Physical examination has been described as a ritual that plays a significant role in the doctor-patient relationship that will provide benefits in other medical encounters. When a physical exam is expected by the patient but is not performed by the provider, patients may express concern for the lack of depth of investigation into their illness, the validity of treatment plans and exclusions, and the doctor-patient relationship.
While elective physical exams have become more elaborate, in routine use physical exams have become less complete. This has led to editorials in medical journals about the importance of an adequate physical examination. Physicians at Stanford University medical school have introduced a set of 25 key physical examination skills that were felt to be useful.
<h4>Background and objective</h4>Evidence base on employment-related medical examinations is highly variable. The aim of this study is to build expert agreement on the appropriate medical and laboratory tests in major industries in Quezon City.<h4>Methods</h4>An initial scoping review of local, national, and international policies on employment-related diagnostic testing was done. The determination of industries at the selected study site (Quezon City) was accomplished through Pareto analysis. Interviews of key informants and representatives, and a consensus-building process through an expert panel were carried out by the Philippine College of Occupational Medicine (PCOM) Quezon City Chapter. Data gathered was used in the study and analyzed. An initial list of medical tests and diagnostics was drafted and the Modified RAND appropriateness method was used as the choice of mixed methods consensus-building process by an expert panel.<h4>Results</h4>Regulations often vary significantly within settings and implementers, particularly the scope, content, and procedures for medical examinations of workers. History taking (including occupational history) and physical examination are the cornerstones of the screening process. CBC and chest x-ray were deemed appropriate screening laboratory tests for asymptomatic pre-employment examination, while only chest x-rays were used during periodic examinations. Additional tests for medical surveillance should be based on job demands and specific exposure. For specific chemical exposure, standard references for medical requirements, like from Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA), can be referred to.<h4>Conclusion</h4>A shift in how occupational health and safety measures are implemented is needed, particularly in the pre-employment and periodic examination practices, for more relevant screening while preventing unnecessary and low-yield testing and reducing costs for the employer and the employee. An occupational screening checklist/questionnaire based on the results of the study that includes appropriate clinical history-taking, review of systems (ROS), physical examination, and laboratories must be devised, which is to be followed by training in the proper conduction of these medical assessments.
To assist patients and their physicians in arriving at the most effective follow-up strategy after treatment for breast cancer.Survival, metastasis-free survival, local recurrence, quality of life.Evidence was based on a literature review using MEDLINE for the years 1991 to 1996, references cited in reviews and consensus conference proceedings.All patients who have completed their primary treatment for breast cancer should have regular follow-up surveillance. The frequency of follow-up visits should be adjusted according to individual patient's needs. The following issues and schedule should be considered: (a) The need to discuss and manage early side effects of therapy, plan a follow-up program and provide general support. (This visit is usually scheduled 4 to 6 weeks after therapy.) (b) The need to establish a post-treatment baseline, detect early recurrences and teach breast self-examination. (This visit is usually 4 to 6 months after therapy.) (c) The need for regular physical and mammographic examination to detect potentially curable disease. (These examinations should be at approximately 1-year intervals indefinitely thereafter.) (d) The need to provide support and counselling may require additional visits for some women, particularly for the first few years. (e) If metastases develop, the frequency of visits must be determined by the symptoms, course of disease and need for further treatment. All visits should include a medical history. For women who are taking tamoxif
Everything we examined (4)
This check searched the claim as stated. It did not run a separate search for evidence against it.