trustme.bro/r/…
✓ checked
trust me, bro:
here is the receipt.
the claim
Robert Lucas stated that markets are continuously in equilibrium cleared by price adjustments
the verdict
REFUTED
the evidence says no
refutedsupported
the weight of evidence
0 sources for · 1 against

A peer-reviewed source on Lucas’ expectational equilibrium, price rigidity, and descriptive realism refutes the claim.

Evidence against · 1
2022 · cited by 4
ABSTRACT Robert Lucas' ([1972b] 1981a) article on the neutrality of money represented the first effective challenge to Samuelson’s neoclassical synthesis methodological separation between static microeconomic optimisation and macroeconomic dynamics. Lucas rejected disequilibrium price dynamics, as expressed by the Walrasian tâtonnement and auctioneer mechanisms. Lucas’ new treatment of equilibrium as an expectational concept, determined by the rational behaviour of information processing agents, was not restricted to market clearing competitive economies. Lucas’ effort to compare alternative rational expectations models of price stickiness (including his 1972 original formulation) led him to stress the notion of descriptive realism of the models’ main assumptions, which played an important role in his original discussion of model robustness.
See more details
The analysis

rails:sufficiency:refuted:single_source:for=0+0p:against=1+0p | v55:sufficiency

Everything we examined (1)
This check searched the claim as stated. It did not run a separate search for evidence against it.
  1. Lucas’ expectational equilibrium, price rigidity, and descriptive realismpeer-reviewedno side taken
This receipt carries no identity, shared or not. Sharing publishes your connection to it, not your data.
Check your own claim
Challenge the receipt
trust me, bro: win the argument, pass the class, survive peer review.
This receipt is an automated verdict against our published method · not an opinion about any author or publication.
Terms · Privacy · How verdicts work · Dispute this receipt