trustme.bro/r/…
✓ checked
trust me, bro:
here is the receipt.
the claim
RNA-seq differs significantly in cost compared to sequencing full-length cDNAs.
the verdict
INSUFFICIENT LEANING
refutedsupported
the weight of evidence
5 sources for · 0 against

The retrieved literature discusses methodological differences and technological comparisons between RNA-Seq and cDNA-based or full-length sequencing approaches, but provides insufficient direct evidence regarding a significant cost difference between them.

Evidence for · 5
2019 · cited by 103
Our vision of DNA transcription and splicing has changed dramatically with the introduction of short-read sequencing. These high-throughput sequencing technologies promised to unravel the complexity of any transcriptome. Generally gene expression levels are well-captured using these technologies, but there are still remaining caveats due to the limited read length and the fact that RNA molecules had to be reverse transcribed before sequencing. Oxford Nanopore Technologies has recently launched a portable sequencer which offers the possibility of sequencing long reads and most importantly RNA molecules. Here we generated a full mouse transcriptome from brain and liver using the Oxford Nanopore device. As a comparison, we sequenced RNA (RNA-Seq) and cDNA (cDNA-Seq) molecules using both long and short reads technologies and tested the TeloPrime preparation kit, dedicated to the enrichment of full-length transcripts. Using spike-in data, we confirmed that expression levels are efficiently captured by cDNA-Seq using short reads. More importantly, Oxford Nanopore RNA-Seq tends to be more efficient, while cDNA-Seq appears to be more biased. We further show that the cDNA library preparation of the Nanopore protocol induces read truncation for transcripts containing internal runs of T’s. This bias is marked for runs of at least 15 T’s, but is already detectable for runs of at least 9 T’s and therefore concerns more than 20% of expressed transcripts in mouse brain and liver. Finally, we outline that bioinformatics challenges remain ahead for quantifying at the transcript level, especially when reads are not full-length. Accurate quantification of repeat-associated genes such as processed pseudogenes also remains difficult, and we show that current mapping protocols which map reads to the genome largely over-estimate their expression, at the expense of their parent gene.
See more details
The analysis

rails:sufficiency:partial_only:for=0+5p:against=0+0p | v55:multi_partial_one_side:lean=lean_partial:for:one_sided

More for · 4
2022 · cited by 14
Direct sequencing of single molecules through nanopores allows for accurate quantification and full-length characterization of native RNA or complementary DNA (cDNA) without amplification. Both nanopore-based native RNA and cDNA approaches involve complex transcriptome procedures at a lower cost. However, there are several differences between the two approaches. In this study, we perform matched native RNA sequencing and cDNA sequencing to enable relevant comparisons and evaluation. Using Saccharomyces cerevisiae, a eukaryotic model organism widely used in industrial biotechnology, two different growing conditions are considered for comparison, including the poly-A messenger RNA isolated from yeast cells grown in minimum media under respirofermentative conditions supplemented with glucose (glucose growth conditions) and from cells that had shifted to ethanol as a carbon source (ethanol growth conditions). Library preparation for direct RNA sequencing is shorter than that for direct cDNA sequencing. The sequence characteristics of the two methods were different, such as sequence yields, quality score of reads, read length distribution, and mapped on reference ability of reads. However, differential gene expression analyses derived from the two approaches are comparable. The unique feature of direct RNA sequencing is RNA modification; we found that the RNA modification at the 5′ end of a transcript was underestimated due to the 3′ bias behavior of the direct RNA sequencing. Our comprehensive evaluation from this work could help researchers make informed choices when selecting an appropriate long-read sequencing method for understanding gene functions, pathways, and detailed functional characterization.
cited by 0
RNA-Seq (short for RNA sequencing) is a next-generation sequencing (NGS) technique used to quantify and identify RNA molecules in a biological sample RNA-Seq (short for RNA sequencing) is a next-generation sequencing (NGS) technique used to quantify and identify RNA molecules in a biological sample, providing a snapshot of the transcriptome at a specific time. It enables transcriptome-wide analysis by sequencing cDNA derived from RNA. Modern workflows often incorporate pseudoalignment tools (such as Kallisto and Salmon) and cloud-based processi Th… Massively parallel single molecule direct RNA-Seq has been explored as an alternative to traditional RNA-Seq, in which RNA-to-cDNA conversion, ligation, amplification, and other sample manipulation steps may introduce biases and artefacts. Technology platforms that perform single-molecule real-time RNA-Seq include Oxford Nanopore Technologies (ONT) Nanopore sequencing. Sequencing RNA in its native form preserves modifications like methylation, allowing them to be investigated directly and simultaneously. Another benefit of single-molecule direct RNA-Seq is that transcripts can be covered in full length, allowing for higher confidence isoform detection and quantification compared to short-read sequencing. Traditionally, single-molecule RNA-Seq methods have higher error rates compared to short-read sequencing, but newer methods like ONT direct RNA-Seq have a reduced error rate. Recent uses of ONT direct RNA-Seq for differential expression in human cell populations have demonstrated that this technology can overcome many limitations of short and long cDNA sequencing.
cited by 0
ise of long-read technologies now opens the possibility to overcome those limitations and biases. Long-read RNA-seq captures a full-length transcript within a single read, thereby allowing accurate transcript annotation and enabling a comprehensive view of the transcriptome. Sequencing prokaryotic transcriptomes using the long-read technology reveals complex operon structures, which provide an important resource for functional annotation ( Yan et al., 2018 ). Currently, the most widely used platforms are Pacific Biosciences (PacBio) and Oxford Nanopore Technologies (ONT). With the read lengths achieved with PacBio (∼15 kb) and with ONT (>30 kb), both surpass lengths of most transcripts ( Harrow et al., 2012 ; Oikonomopoulos et al., 2020 ; Udaondo et al., 2021 ). However, with ONT, if native RNA can be directly sequenced RNA (dRNA-seq) without PCR amplification, then amplification biases are eliminated ( Workman et al., 2019 ). The direct sequencing feature permits detection of RNA base modifications, such as N6-methyladenine (m6A), which has been linked to human obesity and cancer ( Mortazavi et al., 2008 ). In addition, ONT is a more cost-effective method than PacBio in terms of machine cost and number of bases per 1,000 USD ( Byrne et al., 2019 ). Using dRNA-seq ( Jenjaroenpun et al., 2018 ), we recently showed a transcriptional landscape analysis of the Saccharomyces cerevisiae strain, CEN.PK113-7D, a yeast strain that is used extensively in academic and industrial research. We determined transcriptomic profiling under two different growth conditions (diauxic growth). Approximately 70% of the reads corresponded to full-length transcripts. Some full-length transcripts over 5 kb were also detected and mapped. In addition, identification of polyadenylated non-coding RNAs (i.e., ribosomal RNA, telomerase RNA, and long non-coding RNA) is allowed using this sequencing protocol ( Jenjaroenpun et al., 2018 ). After releasing the dRNA-seq approach, a direct cDNA sequen
2019 · cited by 0
Single cell RNA sequencing (scRNA-seq) emerged to characterize gene expression differences between individual cells derived from a complex tissue, allowing a higher resolution look at mRNA abundance than bulk RNA-seq. However, most scRNA-seq methodologies have been coupled to short read sequencing platforms that offer either sparse information for an mRNA spread across the entire transcript or 3’ end tags to quantify gene counts. Neither can reveal contiguous mRNA sequences and the associated isoform-specific open reading frames which often encode proteins with different functional properties. We show that single cell platforms, including the DropSeq and 10X systems, combined with PacBio SMRT Sequencing, can generate full-length cDNA isoforms that can be confidently assigned to individual single cells. We show that, with the recent sequencing chemistry on the PacBio Sequel II system, the average read lengths have exceed 60-100 kb, allowing generation of highly accurate circular consensus reads (CCS). The accurate CCS reads allow precise identification of cell barcodes and UMIs located between the polyadenylation signal and the 3’ cDNA primers, eliminating the need for further error correction. We show that the cell barcodes identified on a matching single cell library of PacBio and Illumina show almost 100% concordance for the top-ranking cells. To characterize the full-length transcripts, we developed the tool SQANTI2 that is an extended version of the original SQANTI software (Tardaquila et al . 2017). SQANTI2 classifies full-length transcripts against a reference annotation (ex: GENCODE) and utilizes additional information such as FANTOM5 cage peak data, polyA motif signals, public RNA-seq junction data (ex: Intropolis), and matching Illumina expression data. Transcripts are classified as full-splice matches (perfect intron chain matches to a reference), incomplete-splice matches (possible 5’ degradation), novel in catalog (novel isoforms using only donot/acceptor sites), novel not in catalog (novel isoforms with at least one novel donor/acceptor site), antisense, intergenic, etc. Such classification becomes important for both bulk RNA-seq analysis, where identification of differentially expressed isoforms or novel splice patterns may indicate disease specificity, and for single cell RNA-seq analysis, where we can begin to look at cell type specific isoform expression. We demonstrate SQANTI2 on multiple single cell data and show that, combining it with another software suite, Cupcake, full-length isoform data can be analyzed with existing single cell tools such as Seurat.
Everything we examined (5)
This check searched the claim as stated. It did not run a separate search for evidence against it.
  1. Transcriptome profiling of mouse samples using nanopore sequencing of cDNA and RNA moleculespeer-reviewedno side taken
  2. RNA-Seqreferenceno side taken
  3. Native RNA or cDNA Sequencing for Transcriptomic Analysis: A Case Study on Saccharomyces cerevisiaepeer-reviewedno side taken
  4. Native RNA or cDNA Sequencing for Transcriptomic Analysis: A Case Study on Saccharomyces cerevisiae - PMCofficial-recordno side taken
  5. Full-Length Transcript Characterization for Single Cell RNA-Seq Analysispeer-reviewedno side taken
The paper trail · every fact has a biography
held for human review08 Aug 2026
This receipt carries no identity, shared or not. Sharing publishes your connection to it, not your data.
Check your own claim
Challenge the receipt
trust me, bro: win the argument, pass the class, survive peer review.
This receipt is an automated verdict against our published method · not an opinion about any author or publication.
Terms · Privacy · How verdicts work · Dispute this receipt