trustme.bro/r/…
✓ checked
trust me, bro:
here is the receipt.
the claim
RNA polymerase predictably fails to transcribe repetitive sequences accurately
the verdict
SUPPORTED
the evidence backs this
refutedsupported
the weight of evidence
6 sources for · 0 against

Multiple studies demonstrate that RNA polymerases predictably undergo transcriptional slippage or inaccurate synthesis when encountering repetitive sequences and homopolymeric stretches.

Evidence for · 6
2015 · cited by 198
Demonstrates that viral RNA polymerases predictably undergo transcriptional slippage when encountering conserved repetitive sequences like GAAAAAA.
See more details
The analysis

The retrieved papers consistently report that RNA polymerases across various organisms and viruses predictably experience transcriptional slippage (indels) when transcribing repetitive sequences and homopolymeric runs. No papers refute this phenomenon; instead, they detail its mechanisms, predictability, and biological consequences. Therefore, the verdict is SUPPORTED.

More for · 5
2015 · cited by 72
Shows via high-throughput sequencing that reiterative initiation and transcriptional slippage occur predictably from the majority of transcription start site region sequences.
2016 · cited by 46
Indicates that viral RNA-dependent RNA polymerases predictably slip at conserved homopolymeric motifs to produce alternative reading frame proteins.
2018 · cited by 10
Compares RNA polymerases and confirms that they predictably exhibit propensity for non-programmed transcriptional slippage at homopolymeric sequences in a sequence-dependent manner.
2018 · cited by 8
Finds that viral polymerases predictably slip at specific homopolymeric nucleotide runs during RNA synthesis.
2024 · cited by 6
Highlights that transcriptional slippage by viral replicases consistently occurs when transcribing specific repetitive motifs such as An stretches.
The paper trail · every fact has a biography
first checked04 Aug 2026
judged → SUPPORTED · 8904 Aug 2026
This receipt carries no identity, shared or not. Sharing publishes your connection to it, not your data.
Check your own claim
Challenge the receipt
trust me, bro: win the argument, pass the class, survive peer review.
This receipt is an automated verdict against our published method · not an opinion about any author or publication.
Terms · Privacy · How verdicts work · Dispute this receipt