RNA migrates slower than DNA of the same size on formaldehyde agarose gels due to secondary structure differences
the verdict
CONTESTED PARTIAL
refutedsupported
the weight of evidence
6 sources for · 1 against
Retrieved sources discuss RNA secondary structures, formaldehyde denaturation, and general mobility comparisons between RNA and DNA in gels, but do not fully establish that RNA specifically migrates slower than DNA on formaldehyde agarose gels due to secondary structure differences.
RNA‐based applications requiring high‐quality, non‐degraded RNA are a foundational element of many research studies. As such, it is paramount that the integrity of experimental RNA is validated prior to cDNA synthesis or other downstream applications. In the absence of expensive equipment such as microfluidic electrophoretic devices, and as an alternative to the costly and time‐consuming standard formaldehyde gel, RNA quality can be quickly analyzed by adding small amounts of commercial bleach to TAE buffer‐based agarose gels prior to electrophoresis. In the presence of low concentrations of bleach, the secondary structure of RNA is denatured and potential contaminating RNases are destroyed. Because of this, the ‘bleach gel’ is a functional approach that addresses the need for an inexpensive and safe way to evaluate RNA integrity and will improve the ability of researchers to rapidly analyze RNA quality.
# RNA migrating slower than DNA on Formaldehyde Gel?
Tags: molecular-biology, molecular-genetics, lab-techniques
- Score: 9
- Views: 1781
- Answers: 1
- Answered: yes
- Asked by: Atl LED (4114 rep)
- Asked: 2015-03-11
- Edited: 2015-03-13
- Site: biology
## Question
So I ran into an interesting problem. I'm getting a linear DNA band that is twice as long (4x bases, but as denatured probably only 2x) as an RNA band running at the same size in a formaldehyde gel.
Both sequences have been isolated an 100% confirmed. The gel was run in MOPS buffer. My experience, and all the publications I've found, show that if anything RNA should run faster. Can anyone think of a reason why the DNA band and RNA band would be running the distance despite the DNA being twice as long?
I've read a lot of fun papers on drag factors in gel matrices now, but none of it leads to this confusing and repeated result.
Edit: Gel and Conditions
Gel was 1M formaldehyde, 1% agarose. Run at 100V for 1.5h. RNA was mixed in a RNA loading dye which contained 15.3% v/v formaldehyde, 41.3% v/v di formamide, 4.6mM EDTA, MOPS, and bromophenol blue. We believe our RNA loading dye to be denaturing, and it ran at expec
Since RNA molecules commonly form stable secondary structures, agarose gel size-fractionation of RNA is routinely achieved by chemical denaturing conditions during electrophoresis. This implies the use of toxic compounds such as methylmercuric hydroxide (1), formaldehyde (3) or cumbersome electrophoretic conditions using glyoxal and dimethylsulfoxide (4) after RNA denaturation. Here, we describe an alternative method in which the RNA molecules are preserved in a denatured state simply by maintaining a high temperature (ca. 50°C) during the electrophoretic separation. To prove the feasibility of the proposed system, we have focused our analysis on ribosomal RNA (rRNA) molecules because it is well known that they form strong, stable secondary structures. We have compared the relative electrophoretic mobility of rRNAs from three distantly related organisms (rat, fruit fly and bacteria) using three different systems: standard non-denaturing agarose gel electrophoresis (5) in 1× TAE buffer (40 mM Tris-acetate, pH 8.0, 1 mM EDTA), formaldehyde agarose gel electrophoresis (2) in HEPES buffer (20 mM HEPES, pH 7.4, 1 mM EDTA, pH 8.0, 0.45 M formaldehyde) and the hot-gel system described below. Moreover, we also demonstrated that RNA size-fractionated under hot conditions is perfectly suitable for blotting and hybridization analysis with a nonradioactive DNA probe, and it gives higher sensitivity in the Northern blot than other optimized procedures that use formaldehyde gels. Total RNA was extracted employing TRI REAGENT (Sigma, St. Louis, MO, USA) following the manufacturer’s instructions. For both hot and formaldehyde gel electrophoresis, 10 μL of total RNA preparations were mixed with 10 μL of formaldehyde buffer (40 mM HEPES, pH 7.4, 2 mM EDTA, pH 8.0, 4 M formaldehyde, 60% formamide), denatured by heating at 75°C for 5 min and chilled immediately on ice/ethanol. Then, 2 μL of gel loading buffer (50% glycerol, 1 mM EDTA pH 8.0, 0.25% bromophenol blue, 0.25% xylene cyanol) were added to the samples. For non-denaturing agarose gel electrophoresis, 1 μL of loading buffer was added to 10 μL of RNA samples. In all cases, the electrophoresis was run in 1.2% agarose gels using the GNA 100 horizontal gel apparatus (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech, Uppsala, Sweden). Separations were ended when the bromophenol dye marker reached the bottom of the gel slab (45 min for the hot agarose and 2 h for the formaldehyde gel). To achieve the hot conditions during electrophoresis, the 1× TAE buffer was heated to 60°C, poured into the apparatus in which the gel had already been placed and, when the temperature reached 50°C, a 15 min pre-electrophoresis at 10 V/cm (130–140 mA) was conducted. Subsequently, denatured RNA samples were loaded and the gel was run at 5 V/cm. Under these conditions, the buffer temperature remained constant at 50°C ± 2°C. Gels were stained in 0.5 μg/mL ethidium bromide in diethylpyrocarbonate (DEPC)-treated water for 15 min and visualized under UV light. In the case of the formaldehyde gel, satisfactory visualization of bands required two subsequent 30 min destaining washes in DEPC-treated water. For Northern analysis, we carried out nonradioactive detection of rat glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase RNA. A 400 bp DNA fragment was labelled with DIG-dUTP using the random primed labeling kit (Roche Molecular Biochemicals, Mannheim, Germany). In the case of the formaldehyde gel, downward transfer was carried out according to the improved method of Ingelbrecht et al. (2). In the case of hot agarose gel electrophoresis, the transfer was accomplished by standard downward capillary using 10× standard saline citrate (SSC) as transfer buffer (20× SSC is 3 M NaCl, 0.3 M sodium citrate, pH 7.0). In both cases, the transfers were stopped after 2.5 h, membranes were dried for 15 min at 37°C and fixed for 1.5 min under UV. Both membranes were prehybridized together in 25 mL hybridization solution containing 50% formamide, 5× SSC, Benchmarks
Samples of RNA may be denatured by treatment with formamide and separated by electrophoresis through agarose gels containing formaldehyde. In this method, RNA is fractionated by electrophoresis through an agarose gel containing 2.2 m formaldehyde.
Abstract Formaldehyde reacts with RNA, and when RNA is heated in the presence of formaldehyde all secondary structures are removed. Hence, gel electrophoresis of RNA in agarose gels containing formaldehyde provides a good denaturing gel system.
Flexibility difference between double-stranded RNA and DNA as revealed by gel electrophoresis
## Abstract
A systematic study of agarose gel electrophoresis of double-stranded RNA in the kilobase range of sizes was performed. The dsRNA to dsDNA relative mobility was found to depend on gel concentration: in low density gels RNA moves slower and in high density gels - faster than DNA of the same molecular size. The electrophoretic differences were interpreted within the reptation theory to be mainly due to the molecular stiffness differences. The dsRNA persistence length was roughly estimated to be about twice as great as that of DNA.
## MeSH terms
- Bacteriophages / genetics*
- Chemical Phenomena
- Chemistry, Physical
- DNA*
- DNA, Bacterial
- Electrophoresis, Agar Gel
- Nucleic Acid Conformation
- Polymorphism, Restriction Fragment Length
- RNA, Double-Stranded*
- RNA, Fungal
- RNA, Viral
- Saccharomyces cerevisiae / genetics*
## Substances
- DNA, Bacterial
- RNA, Double-Stranded
- RNA, Fungal
- RNA, Viral
- DNA
RNA molecular weight determination by agarose gel electrophoresis using formaldehyde as denaturant: comparison of RNA and DNA molecular weight markers - PubMed
Save Email
Send to
Display options
Cite
Display options
## Abstract
Reliable molecular weight measurements of RNA molecules as large as 4.0 X 10(6) dalton can be made on agarose gels containing 2.2 M formaldehyde as denaturant (Lehrach et al., 1977). Both eucaryotic and procaryotic ribosomal RNAs have generally been used as molecular weight markers. However, Maniatis et al. (1982) have suggested the use of restriction fragments of DNA as convenient molecular weight markers for RNA samples run in formaldehyde/agarose gels. This communication compares RNA and DNA molecular weight markers run under identical conditions.
## Publication types
Comparative Study
## MeSH terms
Bacteriophage lambda / analysis
DNA, Viral / isolation & purification*
Electrophoresis, Agar Gel / methods
Escherichia coli / analysis
Formaldehyde
Molecular Weight
Nucleic Acid Denaturation
RNA, Ribosomal / isolation & purification*
## Substances
DNA, Viral
RNA, Ribosomal
Formaldehyde
Everything we examined (7) — 6 independent sources
This check searched the claim as stated. It did not run a separate search for evidence against it.