trustme.bro/r/…
✓ checked
trust me, bro:
here is the receipt.
the claim

Raw IQ changes systematically across the human lifespan at the group level

the verdict
SUPPORTED
the evidence backs this
Recorded sources
2 sources for · 0 against

Counts group repeated records of the same source within each side. They do not measure evidence strength or source independence.

Intelligence and cognitive abilities change systematically across the human lifespan, showing distinct developmental peaks and aging trajectories for fluid versus crystallized domains.

The analysis

The claim is specific and empirically verifiable, testing whether intelligence or raw IQ changes systematically across the human lifespan. Retrieved papers such as [9] and [10] provide direct, high-quality lifespan developmental and longitudinal evidence showing clear, systematic trajectories (such as the rise and fall of fluid and crystallized intelligence and memory across adulthood). There is no refuting evidence among the papers.

Evidence for · 2
Recorded source metadata

Anna M. Momy, Daniel Baena, Laura B. Ray, Adrian Owen, Stuart M. Fogel. Are Age‐Related Differences in Sleep Associated With the Different Trajectories of Fluid and Crystallized Intelligence Across the Lifespan?. 2026. https://doi.org/10.1111/jsr.70364

Paper 9 details how fluid and crystallized intelligence exhibit distinct, systematic trajectories across the lifespan, with fluid intelligence peaking in early adulthood and declining thereafter while crystallized intelligence behaves differently.

See more details
More for · 1
Recorded source metadata

Georgette Argiris, Yaakov Stern, Christian Habeck. Nonlinear Lifespan Trajectories of Memory and Fluid Reasoning: A Longitudinal GAMM Study. 2025. https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-8313556/v1

Paper 10 uses longitudinal modeling to demonstrate robust, systematic nonlinear age-related changes and declines in cognitive domains such as memory and fluid reasoning across adulthood.

The paper trail · every fact has a biography
first checked01 Aug 2026
judged → SUPPORTED · 7501 Aug 2026
Anyone with this link can read the claim and its public receipt, including any personal information in that text. Open permanent receipt.
Check your own claim
Challenge the receipt
Requests are recorded for review. This does not start an automatic check or guarantee a response time.
trust me, bro: win the argument, pass the class, survive peer review.

Citation formatting by citeproc-js (Frank Bennett) and the Citation Style Language project. Source and licenses.

This receipt is an automated verdict against our published method · not an opinion about any author or publication.
Terms · Privacy · How verdicts work · Dispute this receipt