trustme.bro/r/…
✓ checked
trust me, bro:
here is the receipt.
the claim
Rats can epigenetically pass acquired maze memories to offspring
the verdict
REFUTED
the evidence says no
refutedsupported
the weight of evidence
0 sources for · 1 against

Historical replication literature examining early claims of Lamarckian inheritance of training in rats finds that observed improvements in learning rates across generations were artifacts of colony health and control groups, forbidding a Lamarckian interpretation.

Evidence against · 1
1954 · cited by 10
ABSTRACT This is the final report of an experiment of 20 years’ duration, in which we have repeated, in its essentials, the well-known experiment of William McDougall purporting to reveal a Lamarckian inheritance of the effects of training on rats. The test is one involving light discrimination, and McDougall recorded a steady improvement in the rate of learning on a succession of 32 generations; but he omitted to check the results against a properly conducted control. Our experiment confirms McDougall to the extent that we too have obtained long duration trends of improvement in learning-rate (Figs. 2, 3); but we find that the effect is not sustained, and that it is, moreover, shown also by a control experiment, using animals of untrained ancestry. This forbids a Lamarckian interpretation. Statistical analysis of the data indicates that the ‘condition’ of the rat markedly affects its speed of learning, and that progressive changes in learning-rate, over a succession of generations, are in reality correlated with the health of the laboratory colony, which is subject to periods of decline and recovery.
See more details
The analysis

rails:sufficiency:refuted:single_source:for=0+0p:against=1+0p | v55:sufficiency

Everything we examined (1)
This check searched the claim as stated. It did not run a separate search for evidence against it.
  1. Fourth (Final) Report on A Test of McDougall’s Lamarckian Experiment on the Training of Ratspeer-reviewedno side taken
This receipt carries no identity, shared or not. Sharing publishes your connection to it, not your data.
Check your own claim
Challenge the receipt
trust me, bro: win the argument, pass the class, survive peer review.
This receipt is an automated verdict against our published method · not an opinion about any author or publication.
Terms · Privacy · How verdicts work · Dispute this receipt