trustme.bro/r/…
✓ checked
trust me, bro:
here is the receipt.
the claim
Quartodecimo omnium sanctorum corresponds to November 14 on specific Latin inscriptions
the verdict
SUPPORTED
the evidence backs this
refutedsupported
the weight of evidence
1 source for · 0 against
AS REPORTEDno primary record reached; this is what the reporting says

An analysis of a 19th-century Latin grave inscription shows the phrase 'quartodecimo omn sanct' directly corresponding to 'Nov XIV' (November 14).

Evidence for · 1
cited by 0
# Is 'quartodecimo omnium sanctorum' the same as 'Nov XIV' on this Latin grave inscription? Tags: england, latin-language - Score: 17 - Views: 929 - Answers: 1 - Answered: yes - Asked by: Wade B (313 rep) - Asked: 2021-05-13 - Edited: 2021-05-13 - Site: history ## Question I have been translating the Latin inscription on a 19th century tomb in the parish churchyard, Mitcham, south west London, UK. I'm using a Latin dictionary and a 'Latin Made Simple' book I bought many years ago, as well as online resources. I have been able to translate the inscription but have a hit a problem in what looks like a duplication. The tomb is of Richard Cranmer, who died in 1828, and is listed grade 2 by Historic England. In addition, his daughter and widow are in the tomb, and their names are listed below his. The inscription reads HIC IACENT RICARDVS CRANMER LLB HVIVS ECCLESIAE PAROCHVS QVI OBIIT DIE FESTO OMNIVM SANCTORVM A.D. MDCCCXXVIII AET XLIV ESTHER MARIA LOVISA CRANMER FILIA EIVSDEM NATV MINOR QVAE OBIIT DIE OCTAVO OMN SANCT A.D. MDCCCXLI AET XVII ELISABETHA MARIA CRANMER EIVSDEM RCI VIDVA OVAE OBIIT DIE QVARTODECIMO OMN SANCT NOV XIV A.D. MDCCCXLV AET XLV REQVIESCANT IN PACE AMEN I h
See more details
The analysis

rails:sufficiency:supported:single_source:for=1+0p:against=0+0p | v55:sufficiency

Everything we examined (1)
This check searched the claim as stated. It did not run a separate search for evidence against it.
  1. Is 'quartodecimo omnium sanctorum' the same as 'Nov XIV' on this Latin ...referenceno side taken
The paper trail · every fact has a biography
first checked01 Aug 2026
judged → INSUFFICIENT EVIDENCE · 001 Aug 2026
held for human review08 Aug 2026
This receipt carries no identity, shared or not. Sharing publishes your connection to it, not your data.
Check your own claim
Challenge the receipt
trust me, bro: win the argument, pass the class, survive peer review.
This receipt is an automated verdict against our published method · not an opinion about any author or publication.
Terms · Privacy · How verdicts work · Dispute this receipt