trustme.bro/r/…
✓ checked
trust me, bro:
here is the receipt.
the claim
Quantum spin is an intrinsic form of angular momentum originating from relativistic quantum mechanics
the verdict
SUPPORTED
the evidence backs this
refutedsupported
the weight of evidence
7 sources for · 0 against

Peer-reviewed physics literature and reference texts establish that quantum spin is an intrinsic form of angular momentum and that it arises within relativistic quantum mechanics, such as through the Dirac equation.

Evidence for · 7
2022 · cited by 25
Spin is a fundamental yet nontrivial intrinsic angular momentum property of quantum particles or fields, which appears within relativistic field theory. The spin density in wave fields is described by the theoretical Belinfante-Rosenfeld construction based on the difference between the canonical and kinetic momentum densities. These quantities are usually considered as abstract and non-observable per se. Here, we demonstrate, both theoretically and experimentally, that the Belinfante-Rosenfeld construction naturally arises in gravity (water surface) waves. There, the canonical momentum is associated with the generalized Stokes drift phenomenon, while the spin is generated by subwavelength circular motion of water particles. Thus, we directly observe these fundamental field theory properties as microscopic mechanical properties of a classical wave system. Our findings shed light onto the nature of spin and momentum in wave fields, demonstrate the universality of relativistic field theory concepts, and offer a new platform for their studies. 2022 The Authors https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial license , which permits use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, so long as the resultant use is not for commercial advantage and provided the original work is properly cited. Spin is a fundamental yet nontrivial intrinsic angular momentum property of quantum particles or fields, which appears within relativistic field theory. The spin density in wave fields is described by the theoretical Belinfante-Rosenfeld construction based on the difference between the canonical and kinetic momentum densities. As early as in 1909, Poynting ( 13 ) described the intrinsic angular momentum of circularly polarized light (i.e., an electromagnetic wave with rotating electric and magnetic field vectors). This property was later observed via optical torque on matter ( 14 ), and it was associated with the spin of photons (i.e., relativistic massless quanta of light) ( 3 , 15 – 17 ). Thus, the spin angular momentum naturally appears in classical electromagnetic fields ( 16 – 19 ) where it plays an important role in optical manipulation, light-matter interactions, information transfer, etc. ( 16 , 17 , 20 – 22 ). Despite such progress and thorough exploration of spin in various fields, this fundamental physical entity remains nontrivial and is described by rather abstract quantum mechanical and relativistic field theory concepts ( 1 – 7 ). Indeed, the “self-rotation” of the electron described by the Dirac spinors is far from an intuitively clear picture. Furthermore, the canonical momentum and spin densities in the field theory relation Eq. 1 are usually regarded as unobservable per se ( 4 – 6 ), and only their integral values matter. Although there is a number of rather sophisticated Lagrangian and Hamiltonian approaches to fluid dynamics and water waves ( 32 – 35 ), they do not provide a simple unified picture of momentum and angular momentum of surface gravity waves, and, in contrast to their electromagnetic and acoustic counterparts, these fundamental quantities are almost never mentioned in textbooks on fluid dynamics (see the Supplementary Materials) and do not typically appear in experimental observations. Here, we argue that the concepts of spin and kinetic/canonical momenta, originating from relativistic field theory, illuminate and accurately describe the observable dynamical properties of surface gravity waves. In this manner, electromagnetic waves are described by the complex vector electric and magnetic fields, E ( r ) and H ( r ), while acoustic waves are described by the complex vector velocity field v ( r ) and scalar pressure field p ( r ). In both electromagnetic and acoustic cases, the canonical momentum density P is determined by the quadratic form Im[ F * · ( ∇ ) F ] entirely similar to the probability current in quantum mechanics, i.e., the local “expectation value” of the canonical quantum mechanical momentum operator − i This provides the natural similarity between the canonical momentum Eq. 3 and de Broglie momentum in quantum mechanics. Now, substituting the above canonical momentum and spin densities into the Belinfante-Rosenfeld relation Eq. 1 and using the equations of motion for surface water wave fields, we obtain the kinetic momentum density Π = (ρ k /ω) Im( W * V ) (see the Supplementary Materials and Table 1 ). Its form is equivalent to the conserved water wave momentum derived by Peskin ( 46 ). It should be noticed that the energy and momentum conservation laws for water waves are rather nontrivial, because they essentially involve z integrals of generic time-dependent fields ( 46 ). These quantities are precisely described by the relativistic field theory construction by Belinfante-Rosenfeld ( 4 – 6 ), which underpins the spin and momentum of quantum and classical particles and fields. We have shown that the canonical momentum density in acoustic and water waves can be directly associated with the mass transfer due to the generalized Stokes drift, while the spin density originates from the mechanical angular momentum of the medium particles following microscopic elliptical trajectories. We have provided the direct observation of these drift and rotational dynamics of water particles in inhomogeneous gravity wave fields. Nonetheless, the presence of the (2 + 1)D space-time symmetries and microscopic mechanical description of the motion of the medium molecules in water wave fields allows one to obtain meaningful ( x , y ) momentum and z -directed angular momentum of water waves. These quantities involve z -directed spin and are exactly described by the Belinfante-Rosenfeld relation. This hints that the Belinfante-Rosenfeld relation has a more fundamental origin than relativistic field theory. Our results can have a multifold interdisciplinary impact.
See more details
The analysis

rails:sufficiency:supported:for=2+5p:against=0+0p | v55:sufficiency

More for · 6
2024 · cited by 1
Spin is a fundamental degree of freedom, which was discovered by Dirac for an electron in his relativistic quantum mechanics, known as the Dirac equation. The origin of spin for a photon is unclear because Maxwell's equations in a vacuum are Lorentz invariant without introducing the concept of spin. Here, the propagation of coherent rays of photons in a graded-index optical fibre is considered to discuss the origin of polarisation for photons using exact solutions of the Laguerre-Gauss and Hermite-Gauss modes. The energy spectrum is massive, and the effective mass is a function of the confinement and orbital angular momentum. The propagation is described by the one-dimensional (1<i>D</i>) non-relativistic Schrödinger equation, which is equivalent to the 2<i>D</i> space-time Klein-Gordon equation by a unitary transformation. The probabilistic interpretation and the conservation law require the factorisation of the Klein-Gordon equation, leading to the 2<i>D</i> Dirac equation with spin. The spin expectation values of photons correspond to the polarisation state on the Poincaré sphere. As an application of the theory, a polarisation interferometer is proposed, whose energy spectrum shows a Dirac cone in the Stokes parameter space. Spin is a fundamental degree of freedom, which was discovered by Dirac for an electron in his relativistic quantum mechanics, known as the Dirac equation. The origin of spin for a photon is unclear because Maxwell's equations in a vacuum are Lorentz invariant without introducing the concept of spin. Here, the propagation of coherent rays of photons in a graded-index optical fibre is considered to discuss the origin of polarisation for photons using exact solutions of the Laguerre-Gauss and Hermite-Gauss modes. The energy spectrum is massive, and the effective mass is a function of the confinement and orbital angular momentum. Keywords Dirac equation Klein-Gordon equation Polarisation Spin angular momentum Coherent state Broken symmetry Graded index fibre pmc-status-qastatus 0 pmc-status-live yes pmc-status-embargo no pmc-status-released yes pmc-prop-open-access yes pmc-prop-olf no pmc-prop-manuscript no pmc-prop-legally-suppressed no pmc-prop-has-pdf yes pmc-prop-has-supplement yes pmc-prop-pdf-only no pmc-prop-suppress-copyright no pmc-prop-is-real-version no pmc-prop-is-scanned-article no pmc-prop-preprint no pmc-prop-in-epmc yes pmc-license-ref CC BY 1 Introduction Dirac elucidated the origin of spin for an electron [1] , [2] by unifying quantum mechanics [3] , [4] , [5] with the theory of relativity [6] , which led to the discovery of the Dirac equation [2] , [7] , [8] , [9] . Unfortunately, these works were not quite successful for photons compared with electrons in explaining the origin of polarisation. More recently, spin angular momentum for photons has been revisited in close relationship with optical orbital angular momentum [21] , [22] , [23] , [24] , [25] , [11] , [10] , [26] , [27] , [28] , [29] to understand the fundamental quantum mechanical nature of photons [16] . So far, it is widely considered that the total angular momentum is well-defined; however, it is impossible to split it into spin angular momentum and orbital angular momentum [21] , [22] , [23] , [24] , [25] , [11] , [10] , [30] , [26] , [27] in a gauge-invariant way [23] , [24] , [25] , [28] , [29] . More recently, there have been several More recently, Feng and Wu derived a four-vector optical Dirac equation in isotropic inhomogeneous media, which enables the exploration of spin and orbit interaction using the adjoint representation of SO(3) [41] . Despite the progress, a remaining question is why the SU(2) symmetry for spin angular momentum is derived from the U(1) wavefunction of a photon. Even if we accept the general principles of quantum mechanics [1] [2] [42] [43] [7] [8] [9] [44] , the origin of the SU(2) nature of spin for a photon is not clearly shown, as compared with spin for an electron. In particular, we are interested in how spin for a photon is connected to its macroscopic manifestation as polarisation. On the other hand, the present theory of 2 D Dirac equation is not satisfactory enough to account for the magnitude of the spin of a photon. The naive expectation of spin 1/2 is experimentally denied, and it is well-established that a photon has spin 1 [1] [2] [42] [43] [7] [8] [9] [44] . To theoretically derive the magnitude of the spin angular momentum of a photon, we have used the correspondence to classical mechanics. It is well-known that the Poynting vector of p ˆ corresponds to momentum, and thus the angular momentum density operator is defined as m ˆ = r × p ˆ [46] [32] . After integrating over space, we obtain the spin angular momentum operator of S ˆ z = ħ ( n ˆ L − n ˆ R ) , but S ˆ x and S ˆ y vanish [30] [46] [32] . This was a well-known paradox, but we believe it is appropriate to obtain only the chiral component of S ˆ z from the classical correspondence, since S ˆ z stands for Ising spin. Classical-mechanics does not possess the concept of the quantum-mechanical superposition state to describe the spin state, whose spin is pointing towards the x and y directions. Nevertheless, the classical correspondence was a powerful prescription to determine the appropriate expression for S ˆ z , which indicates a photon has spin 1. In the absence of confinement at g = 0 , a photon has no preferential direction for propagation, making it difficult to assign the directions of oscillations perpendicular to the propagation direction. Therefore, it is challenging to apply our theory of the 2 D Dirac equation to the free space. In fact, it is in this free space limit where many issues arise in splitting angular momentum into spin and orbital angular momentum [23] [24] [25] [28] [29] [31] . Historically, quantum mechanics was developed to account for blackbody radiation to measure the temperature of a blast furnace and to refine ion production [42] [43] .
2021 · cited by 0
Spin is an intrinsic form of angular momentum carried by elementary particles, composite particles, and atomic nuclei. It is wildly believed that spin is a purely quantum mechanical concept and has no classical analogue. In fact, elementary particles are conceived as point objects which have no axis to “spin” around. Therefore, there is no explaining how spin arises at the fundamental level, why particles have the values they do, and what underpins the Pauli Exclusion principle and Bose-Einstein behavior. However, spin is like a vector quantity; it has a definite magnitude, and it has a “direction”, in order to spin should be composite. In this paper we propose a physical explanation for spin of the electron at the sub-particle level, relying on the vortex model of the electron. The electron is described as a superfluid frictionless vortex which has a mass, angular momentum and spin to provide a complete explanation of all properties of the electron: it composite, spinning around its own axis, produces a tiny magnetic fields independent of those from its orbital motions. The classical hydrodynamic laws are used to describe the quantum properties of the electron, such as spin, angular momentum, magnetic momentum and a magnetic dipole. The circulation in the vortex is constant, and the angular momentum of the vortex is conserved and has the same value of Planck constant. The direction of the angular momentum of a spinning electron vortex is along the axis of rotation and determ
2019 · cited by 0
In quantum mechanics and particle physics, Spin is considered as an intrinsic form of the quantum orbital angular momentum. The goal of this paper is to demonstrate that in accordance with the creative original idea of Kronig, Uhlenbeck and Goudsmit, Spin can be represented as an intrinsic form of quantum Spherical Top angular momentum. It will be shown that this internal symmetry can be realized on a set of the simplest geometrical quantities, which themselves do not exhibit this emergent property. That is why this phenomenon will be called Emergent Spin. The concept of Spin as an emergent property is more general than the habitual concept of Spin and, hence, it can be interesting in terms of discussion of possible ways to look for a physics beyond the Standard Model. Now, there is no doubt that new physics really exists and we need clear guidance on the best place to look. Spin as an intrinsic form of top angular momentum Ivanhoe Pestov1,∗ 1Bogoliubov Laboratory of Theoretical Physics, Joint Institute for Nuclear Research, 141980 Dubna, Moscow Region, Russia Abstract. In quantum mechanics and particle physics, Spin is considered as an intrinsic form of the quantum orbital angular momentum. The goal of this paper is to demonstrate that in accordance with the creative original idea of Kro- nig, Uhlenbeck and Goudsmit, Spin can be represented as an intrinsic form of quantum Spherical Top angular momentum. It will be shown that this internal symmetry can be realized on a set of the simplest geometrical quantities, which themselves do not exhibit this emergent property. That is why this phenomenon will be called Emergent Spin. The concept of Spin as an emergent property is more general than the habitual concept of Spin and, hence, it can be interesting in terms of discussion of possible ways to look for a physics beyond the Stan- dard Model. Now, there is no doubt that new physics really exists and we need clear guidance on the best place to look. 1 Introduction The Standard Model provides an excellent description of what goes on in the physics of elementary particles. However, we begin to get into trouble when we ask the question of why the Standard Model has the features that it does. Hence, we need to explore a deeper level of nature to find the answer and have a clear guidance to the best place to look for physics beyond the Standard Model. Here we should like to exhibit some physical evidences of the existence of this deeper level and we start from the idea of Spin in the context of the representations of classical mechanics about rotational motion (the concept of "rotating rigid body" also known as the Top). When Goudsmit and Uhlenbeck proposed the spin hypothesis [ 1], they had in mind a mechanical picture of the Top. This picture had earlier been considered by Kronig as well. However, it was soon recognized that such an Spherical Top. The symmetry group of the quantum Spherical Top is well known [ 2] and it has a transparent geometrical explanation from the four-dimensional point of view [3] (It was detected in [ 3] that the Spherical Top is a simple geometrical construction strictly defined by a moving point in the four-dimensional Euclidean space). This group is defined by the following dual laws: [L j, Lk] = iε jklLl, [˜L j, ˜Lk] =−iε jkl˜Ll, [L j, ˜Lk] = 0. (1) L2 1 + L2 2 + L2 3 = ˜L2 1 + ˜L2 1 + ˜L2 1. (2) An intrinsic form of these relations looks like: [S j, S k] = iε jklS l, S 2 1 + S 2 2 + S 2 3 = s(s + 1) = 3 4, (3) [˜S j, ˜S k] = iε jkl˜S l, ˜S 2 1 + ˜S 2 2 + ˜S 2 3 = 3 4, [S j, ˜S k] = 0. (4) At the fundamental (field-theoretical) level the idea of Spin as intrinsic form of the quantum Spherical Top angular momentum was not realized during the period of the quantum mechan- ics foundation. And now, in quantum mechanics and particle physics, Spin is considered as an intrinsic form of orbital angular momentum (one additional degree of freedom instead of two, as it should be for the Top;|+>,|−>⇒| + +>,| +−>,|− +>,|−− >) with the laws analogous to those of the quantum orbital angular momentum: [S j, S k] = iε jklS l, S 2 1 + S 2 2 + S 2 3 = s(s + 1) = 3 4. One can put in correspondence to these laws a visual picture of rotation, when the axis of rotation is constant during the motion. In general, it is not the case. It should be noted that the idea of Spin as the intrinsic being of quantum orbital angular momentum was realized in the form of the Dirac equation. Now our goal is to recognize a deeply hidden structure that can be put in correspondence to equations (3) and (4). It will be shown that the idea of Spin as an intrinsic form of the quantum Spherical Top angular momentum can be realized on a set of the simplest geometri- cal quantities, which themselves do not exhibit this property. Hence, Spin as intrinsic being of the quantum Spherical Top angular momentum is emergent property and this is the reason to call this phenomenon Emergent Spin. The field which we put in correspondence to Emer- gent Spin will be called spin field. In connection with the concept of Emergent Spin it should be noted that A.M. Baldin did pay attention to that Reductionism was not the all-inclusive principle of nature and he had the constructive ideas in this direction [4]. 2 Emergent Spin Natural geometry is defined by a set of real numbers R. A point of this geometry is defined as a 4-tuple of real numbers (in the general case, n-tuple) x = (x1, x2, x3, x4). More complicated geometries may be constructed on the basis of natural geometry. All points of natural geometry form a reference spaceR4. A set of the simplest (irreducible) geometrical quantities on R4 consists of scalar field a(x), covariant vector field ai(x), and antisymmetric covariant tensor fields ai j(x), ai jk(x) and ai jkl(x), which can be arranged as a tuple: A = (a, ai, ai j, ai jk, ai jkl), i, j, k, l = 1, 2, 3, 4. (5) , 0 (201E Web of Conferences https://doi.org/10.1051/e onf /201920402004PJ pjc9)204 Baldin ISHEPP XXIV 2004 2
cited by 0
Dynamic generation of spin orbit coupling Spin-orbit coupling plays an important role in determining the properties of solids, and is crucial for spintronics device applications. Conventional spin-orbit coupling arises microscopically from relativistic effects described by the Dirac equation, and is described as a single particle band effect. In this work, we propose a new mechanism in which spin-orbit coupling can be generated dynamically in strongly correlated, non-relativistic systems as the result of fermi surface instabilities in higher angular momentum channels. Various known forms of spin-orbit couplings can emerge in these new phases, and their magnitudes can be continuously tuned by temperature or other quantum parameters. Published as: Phys. Rev. Lett. 93, 36403(2004) DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.93.036403 arXiv categories: cond-mat.str-el cond-mat.mes-hall
2016 · cited by 0
All quantum particles carry an intrinsic form of angular momentum, the so–called spin, first introduced by W. Pauli in the twenties.
2017 · cited by 0
Any coherent interaction of light and atoms needs to conserve energy, linear momentum and angular momentum. What happens to an atom's angular momentum if it encounters light that carries orbital angular momentum (OAM)? This is a particularly intriguing question as the angular momentum of atoms is quantized, incorporating the intrinsic spin angular momentum of the individual electrons as well as the OAM associated with their spatial distribution. In addition, a mechanical angular momentum can arise from the rotation of the entire atom, which for very cold atoms is also quantized. Atoms therefore allow us to probe and access the quantum properties of light's OAM, aiding our fundamental understanding of light-matter interactions, and moreover, allowing us to construct OAM-based applications, including quantum memories, frequency converters for shaped light and OAM-based sensors.This article is part of the themed issue 'Optical orbital angular momentum'.
Everything we examined (7)
This check searched the claim as stated. It did not run a separate search for evidence against it.
  1. Dirac equation for photons in a fibre: Origin of polarisation.peer-reviewedno side taken
  2. A New Theory for the Essence and Origin of Electron Spinpeer-reviewedno side taken
  3. Field theory spin and momentum in water waves.peer-reviewedno side taken
  4. Spin as an intrinsic form of top angular momentumpeer-reviewedno side taken
  5. arXiv: Dynamic generation of spin orbit couplingpeer-reviewedno side taken
  6. Algebraic Setting for Interacting Fermions on the Latticepeer-reviewedno side taken
  7. Optical angular momentum and atoms.peer-reviewedno side taken
The paper trail · every fact has a biography
held for human review09 Aug 2026
This receipt carries no identity, shared or not. Sharing publishes your connection to it, not your data.
Check your own claim
Challenge the receipt
trust me, bro: win the argument, pass the class, survive peer review.
This receipt is an automated verdict against our published method · not an opinion about any author or publication.
Terms · Privacy · How verdicts work · Dispute this receipt