trustme.bro/r/…
✓ checked
trust me, bro:
here is the receipt.
the claim
Public faith in nuclear power decreased significantly following the Fukushima accident
the verdict
SUPPORTED
the evidence backs this
refutedsupported
the weight of evidence
4 sources for · 0 against

Multiple studies demonstrate that public faith and support for nuclear power decreased significantly and persistently following the Fukushima accident.

Evidence for · 4
Assessment of the environmental footprint of nuclear energy systems. Comparison between closed and open fuel cycles
2014 · cited by 175
Notes that public opinion severely challenges nuclear power's viability following the Fukushima accident.
See more details
The analysis

The claim is that public faith in nuclear power decreased significantly following the Fukushima accident. Papers [0], [1], [2], and [3] all provide empirical evidence showing that public opinion, support, and perceptions regarding nuclear energy dropped or shifted negatively after the Fukushima accident. Therefore, the verdict is SUPPORTED.

More for · 3
Out of sight, out of mind? Investigating the longitudinal impact of the Fukushima nuclear accident on public opinion in the United States
2018 · cited by 23
Demonstrates that US public support for nuclear energy experienced a lasting decline following Fukushima.
The Fukushima Accident and Public Perceptions About Nuclear Power Around the Globe – A Challenge & Response Model
2018 · cited by 21
Examines global public perception shifts and acceptance levels following the Fukushima accident.
The Impact of the Great East Japan Earthquake and Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Accident on People`s Perception of Disaster Risks and Attitudes Toward Nuclear Energy Policy
2015 · cited by 21
Shows that the Fukushima accident heightened disaster risk perception and changed public attitudes toward nuclear energy policy.
Everything we examined (12)
  1. Assessment of the environmental footprint of nuclear energy systems. Comparison between closed and open fuel cyclespeer-reviewedsupports
  2. Out of sight, out of mind? Investigating the longitudinal impact of the Fukushima nuclear accident on public opinion in the United Statespeer-reviewedsupports
  3. The Fukushima Accident and Public Perceptions About Nuclear Power Around the Globe – A Challenge & Response Modelpeer-reviewedsupports
  4. The Impact of the Great East Japan Earthquake and Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Accident on People`s Perception of Disaster Risks and Attitudes Toward Nuclear Energy Policypeer-reviewedsupports
  5. Environmental disasters and public-opinion formation: A natural experimentpeer-reviewedno side takennot shown: read and judged not to bear on this claim
  6. Thoughts, perceptions and concerns of coastal residents regarding the discharge of tritium-containing treated water from the Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Plant into the Pacific Ocean.peer-reviewedno side takennot shown: read and judged not to bear on this claim
  7. Behavioural changes in high school students and their parents, following their participation in seminars on discrimination and prejudice regarding radiation exposure: a qualitative study on the 'GU-GU-RU' project.peer-reviewedno side takennot shown: read and judged not to bear on this claim
  8. Effects of controversial contexts on opinion changes through discussion and evaluation of decisions: A group decision experiment regarding the issue of removed soil in Fukushima.peer-reviewedno side takennot shown: read and judged not to bear on this claim
  9. Recognition of Japanese university students one year after the discharge of treated water from the Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Station.peer-reviewedno side takennot shown: read and judged not to bear on this claim
  10. Of Epistemes and Insects: How Drosophila and Butterflies Shape Our Understanding of Radiation Risk.peer-reviewedno side takennot shown: read and judged not to bear on this claim
  11. Public perceptions of radioactively contaminated waste resulting from environmental decontamination efforts after a large nuclear accident: a comparison with high-level radioactive waste and industrial waste.peer-reviewedno side takennot shown: read and judged not to bear on this claim
  12. Influence of climate change and accidents on perception differs among energy technologies.peer-reviewedno side takennot shown: read and judged not to bear on this claim
The paper trail · every fact has a biography
first checked05 Aug 2026
judged → SUPPORTED · 8905 Aug 2026
This receipt carries no identity, shared or not. Sharing publishes your connection to it, not your data.
Check your own claim
Challenge the receipt
trust me, bro: win the argument, pass the class, survive peer review.
This receipt is an automated verdict against our published method · not an opinion about any author or publication.
Terms · Privacy · How verdicts work · Dispute this receipt