trustme.bro/r/…
✓ checked
trust me, bro:
here is the receipt.
the claim

Psychology journals have published articles promoting reproducible data analysis

the verdict
SUPPORTED
the evidence backs this
Recorded sources
3 sources for · 0 against

Counts group repeated records of the same source within each side. They do not measure evidence strength or source independence.

Psychological journals and researchers have increasingly promoted reproducible data analysis and open science practices, such as preregistration and data sharing, in response to replication concerns.

The analysis

The claim is specific and empirically verifiable. Retrieved papers document that psychology journals and the broader field have increasingly published articles, guides, and research focusing on open science, transparency, and reproducible data analysis. There are no papers refuting this trend.

Evidence for · 3
Recorded source metadata

Charlotte Rebecca Pennington. A Student's Guide to Open Science: Using the Replication Crisis to Reform Psychology. 2024. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/2tqep

Pennington's guide explores how open science practices—including open data and code—are being integrated into psychology to address the replication crisis.

See more details
More for · 2
Recorded source metadata

Vize CE, Lynam DR. Open science practices in personality disorder journals.. 2026. https://doi.org/10.1037/per0000752

The study examines the adoption and promotion of open science practices, such as analytic scripts and data sharing, across personality and clinical psychology journals.

Recorded source metadata

Lönnqvist JE. Manufacturing Pessimism: Structural Incentives and Social Psychology's Narrative of Human Nature.. 2026. https://doi.org/10.1177/17456916261458313

The paper discusses ongoing reform efforts in psychology journals, including registered reports and open data initiatives designed to improve reproducibility.

The paper trail · every fact has a biography
first checked01 Aug 2026
judged → SUPPORTED · 8201 Aug 2026
Anyone with this link can read the claim and its public receipt, including any personal information in that text. Open permanent receipt.
Check your own claim
Challenge the receipt
Requests are recorded for review. This does not start an automatic check or guarantee a response time.
trust me, bro: win the argument, pass the class, survive peer review.

Citation formatting by citeproc-js (Frank Bennett) and the Citation Style Language project. Source and licenses.

This receipt is an automated verdict against our published method · not an opinion about any author or publication.
Terms · Privacy · How verdicts work · Dispute this receipt